https://www.facebook.com/ThisDayInGoodloveHistory
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jeff-Goodlove/323484214349385
Join me on http://www.linkedin.com/
Jeff Goodlove email address: Jefferygoodlove@aol.com
Surnames associated with the name Goodlove have been spelled the following different ways; Cutliff, Cutloaf, Cutlofe, Cutloff, Cutlove, Cutlow, Godlib, Godlof, Godlop, Godlove, Goodfriend, Goodlove, Gotleb, Gotlib, Gotlibowicz, Gotlibs, Gotlieb, Gotlob, Gotlobe, Gotloeb, Gotthilf, Gottlieb, Gottliebova, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlow, Gutfrajnd, Gutleben, Gutlove
The Chronology of the Goodlove, Godlove, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlieb (Germany, Russia, Czech etc.), and Allied Families of Battaile, (France), Crawford (Scotland), Harrison (England), Jackson (Ireland), LeClere (France), Lefevre (France), McKinnon (Scotland), Plantagenets (England), Smith (England), Stephenson (England?), Vance (Ireland from Normandy), Washington, Winch (England, traditionally Wales), including correspondence with George Rogers Clark, Thomas Jefferson, and ancestors William Henry Harrison, Andrew Jackson and George Washington.
The Goodlove Family History Website:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/g/o/o/Jeffery-Goodlove/index.html
The Goodlove/Godlove/Gottlieb families and their connection to the Cohenim/Surname project:
• New Address! http://wwwfamilytreedna.com/public/goodlove/default.aspx
• • Books written about our unique DNA include:
• “Abraham’s Children, Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People” by Jon Entine.
•
• “ DNA & Tradition, The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews” by Rabbi Yaakov Kleiman, 2004.
“Jacob’s Legacy, A Genetic View of Jewish History” by David B. Goldstein, 2008.
On December 8, 1529, Thomas Boleyn (Father in law of the 7th cousin 15x removed), Viscount Rochford, was created Earl of Wiltshire and Earl of Ormond.[11]
His only surviving son, George (brother in law of the 7th cousin 15x removed) , was styled Viscount Rochford 1529-30, and created Lord Rochford before July 13, 1530. On May 17, 1536 he was executed for treason, and all his titles were forfeited.[12] His widow, Jane, Viscountess Rochford (wife of the brother in law of the 7th cousin 15x removed, continued to use the courtesy title[citation needed] until she, too, was attainted for treason and beheaded on Tower Hill on February 13, 1542 with Queen Katherine Howard (wife of the 7th cousin 15x removed), the King's fifth wife.[13]
Boleyn was appointed Lord Privy Seal in 1530. In 1532, his daughter Anne was granted a peerage, being created Marquess of Pembroke in her own right, before marrying Henry the following year and becoming queen consort. Boleyn acquiesced in her judicial execution and that of her brother Lord Rochford when Henry discarded her in favour of Jane Seymour. At this point Boleyn was replaced as Lord Privy Seal and left in disgrace until his death a few years later.[14] He suffered a final indignity as the claims of Piers Butler to the Earldom of Ormond were recognized and as he was styled earl of Ormond from January 22, 1538.[14] There were two earls of Ormond in the Kingdom until his death on March 12, 1539.[14][1]
•Sir Thomas Boleyn KG KB (1523–1525)
•The Rt. Hon. The Viscount Rochford KG KB (1525–1527)
•The Rt. Hon. The Earl of Wiltshire and of Ormond KG KB (December 8, 1529[14]–1539)
Note: on February 22, 1538, the earldom of Ormond was restored to Piers Butler, 8th Earl of Ormond.[2]
December 8, 1542. — On the 8th December^[3] was born, in the castle of Linlithgow, Mary Stuart (9th cousin 13x removed), daughter of James V, King of Scotland, and Mary of Guise, Duchess-dowager of Longueville. [4]
Mary Stuart
Portrait of Mary after François Clouet, c. 1559
Queen of Scots
Reign
December 14, 1542 – July 24, 1567
Coronation
September 9, 1543
Predecessor
James V
Successor
James VI
Regent
· James Hamilton, 2nd Earl of Arran (1542–1554)
· Mary of Guise (1554–1560)
Queen consort of France
Tenure
July 10, 1559 – December 5, 1560
Spouse
· Francis II of France
m. 1558; dec. 1560
· Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley
m. 1565; dec. 1567
· James Hepburn, 4th Earl of Bothwell
m. 1567; dec. 1578
Issue
James VI of Scotland and I of England
House
House of Stuart
Father
James V of Scotland
Mother
Mary of Guise
Born
December 8, 1542[1]
Linlithgow Palace, Linlithgow
Died
February 8, 1587(1587-02-08) (aged 44)[2]
Fotheringhay Castle, Northamptonshire
Burial
Peterborough Cathedral; Westminster Abbey
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/1c/Marysign.jpg/125px-Marysign.jpg
Religion
Roman Catholic
Mary, Queen of Scots (December 8, 1542 – February 8, 1587), also known as Mary Stuart[3] or Mary I of Scotland, was queen regnant of Scotland from December 14,1542 to July 24, 1567 and queen consort of France from July 10, 1559 to December 5,1560.
Mary, the only surviving legitimate child of King James V of Scotland, was 6 days old when her father died and she succeeded to the throne. She spent most of her childhood in France while Scotland was ruled by regents, and in 1558, she married the Dauphin of France, Francis. He ascended the French throne as King Francis II in 1559, and Mary briefly became queen consort of France, until his death on December 5, 1560. Widowed, Mary returned to Scotland, arriving in Leith on August 19,1561. Four years later, she married her first cousin, Henry Stuart, Lord Darnley, but their union was unhappy. In February 1567, his residence was destroyed by an explosion, and Darnley was found murdered in the garden.[5]
Mary was born on December 8,1542 at Linlithgow Palace, Linlithgow, Scotland, to James V, King of Scots, and his French second wife, Mary of Guise. She was said to have been born prematurely and was the only legitimate child of James to survive him.[5] She was the great-niece of King Henry VIII of England, as her paternal grandmother, Margaret Tudor, was Henry VIII's sister. On December 14, six days after her birth, she became Queen of Scots when her father died, perhaps from the effects of a nervous collapse following the Battle of Solway Moss,[6] or from drinking contaminated water while on campaign.[7]
A popular legend, first recorded by John Knox, states that James, hearing on his deathbed that his wife had given birth to a daughter, ruefully exclaimed, "It came with a lass, it will pass with a lass!"[8] His House of Stewart had gained the throne of Scotland by the marriage of Marjorie Bruce, daughter of Robert the Bruce, to Walter Stewart, 6th High Steward of Scotland. The Crown had come to his family through a woman, and would be lost from his family through a woman. This legendary statement came true much later—not through Mary, whose son by one of her Stewart cousins became king, but through his descendant Anne, Queen of Great Britain.[9][6]
Mary, Queen of Scots
House of Stuart
Born: December 8, 1542 Died: February 8, 1587
Regnal titles
Preceded by
James V
Queen of Scots
December 14, 1542 – July 24 1567
Succeeded by
James VI
French royalty
Preceded by
Catherine de' Medici
Queen consort of France
July 10, 1559 – December 5, 1560
Vacant
Title next held by
Elisabeth of Austria
December 8, 1568: Murray officially produces before the English commissioners the love-letters and other papers attributed to Mary, and accuses her of having been a party to the plot devised by Bothwell against Darnley. [7]
December 8, 1584: To Queen Elizabeth (8th cousin 14x removed). [8]
From Wingfield, the 8th December [1584.]
Madam, — Having the heart worthy of one who has the honour of being descended from blood so royal as yours, and sincerely resolved to give you every proof of an obedient and affectionate relative which you can require, it gives me much pain to find myself thwarted in so good an intention. For, although that it is hard for me in many respects to be deprived of rny liberty among all other princes my kinsfolk, allies, or
confederates, I have at length considered that having some interest in me to depend on you, and to have been formerly obliged to you for the friendship which you were pleased to remind Nau you bore to me, I should bear it patiently, and, in the hope of your good disposition, submitting to you, as they say in our country, as to the chief of our house ; but seeing that, after having placed myself absolutely in your
hands, if you were pleased to receive me, I am treated with such severity by you, or him who occupies my place (to my great regret, being unable to get possession of it myself), and who has no right to it but from you alone, or by your command, I neither can nor dare tell you what 1 think of it.
Excuse me, then, madam, if, finding myself in such a labyrinth, I presume beyond my duty to enclose a letter to the person to whom I have given all credit, under your cover ; which having done naturally and upon the first impulse, I have considered it well and shown it to myself to be an act too familiar, and which might be attributed to presumption ; but, at the end of three days, during which I was kept
in the hope that I would hear of him, seeing that whoever came or went there was nothing for me, I think that, having submitted myself to you alone, you alone will pardon my enforced fault, having no other means either of troubling you with too long a letter, or, wdth your permission, of forwarding the other to Nau, and that so much the more boldly that he has nothing to do there except with yourself.
For God^s sake, madam, know the truth, and inform me of your pleasure by him to whom I have given authority, without his using ciphers in it at the pleasure of others ; and believe that, commanding me as your own, you will be more sincerely obeyed by me than by those who endeavour to prevent me being heard by you. I fear the vindictiveness of some, I know not whom ; but I protest to you, on the faith
of a Christian, that I have none against any of yours ; but I
wish to love all those who are faithful and agreeable to you,
without resentment, so far as it will please you. In short, I
entreat you, remove me from the distress in which I am, and command, if there is any fault, that it may be amended.
Would to God that I had two hours' conversation with you !
it would, perhaps, be of as much advantage to you as to me.
I entreat you that no one may by my complaint be induced to do worse to me ; but make use of it so as to serve yourself by me, and others by my example. May God give you, madam my good sister, as many happy years as I have had of sorrows these last twenty years !
Wingfield, this 8th December, the forty-second of my age,
and eighteenth of my imprisonment. [9]
1585: ** Drake successfully raids Spanish possessions in the Caribbean. [10]
December 8, 1585: To Monsieur de Chateauneuf. [11]
From Tutbury, the 8th December, 1585.
Mr. Ambassador, — some days ago my keeper imparted to me (having, as he showed to me, orders so to do) the imprisonment of my son in the hands of the Scots banished by him, and who had fled to the Queen of England ; being (according to what he said) returned to Scotland with an army of seven thousand men, and, after having surprised the town of Stirling, and compelled my son to surrender and deliver to them the castle of the said town in which he was, pursuing now to the utmost
extremity the chief persons who were about him, especially the Earl of Arran, formerly so much favoured and supported on this side against myself. Theee news have indeed produced the effect for which they have been reported to me with such great expedition, namely, to add to me affliction upon affliction, both in mind and body, without any pity for the extent of the disease to which the severities of this imprisonment have at length reduced me. But that which grieves me most is to see myself entirely prevented from bringing any remedy to this misfortune, being held bound hand and foot, and nothing as it were left to me but the voice, yet very feeble, to lament to my God, a treatment so cruel and inhuman ; in short, deprived of all other news of Christendom,
from which I might receive the least consolation in the world, I recognise in this occurrence a just judgment of God upon my child, chastising him to bring him back, as I hope, to repentance for having failed in his duty, faith, and promises to his true and natural and very affectionate mother, allowing himself to separate from her to entrust himself, destitute of all protection, to the ambushes and perfidy of his enemies, so often tried against himself and all his family. At least he cannot but remember now, that having heretofore preferred to retain the crown of Scotland by the force, violence, and
rebellion of subjects alone, than to accept my free consent to secure him and make him the lawful possessor of it, (which has been invariably my main scope and intention), he has left to our said subjects the door open, as I have often predicted to him, to use him, when they incline, in the same manner as I have been, and yet with greater appearance of
justice. For if a son is entitled to dispossess his mother, a lawful queen, and without any exception, what cannot our said subjects dare against a child rebellious, ungrateful, and tyrannical, such as in their consciences I am sure that they hold him to be, although in his infancv some have lent him the name of king, to possess themselves in effect of the entire authority by means of it ? But, notwithstanding all which in that or otherwise he may have failed towards me (which I
attribute rather to the evil advice and sinister designs on this side sufficiently revealed, than to his own proper motion and natural inclination), I cannot but, as a very affectionate mother, which I have ever been to him, and ever will be until death, feel at the bottom of my heart his present misery, and make every effort in my power, were it at the risk of my own life, to ^varrant his from the imminent danger in which I perceive it to be. For, in a word, it is now only his death or
perpetual imprisonment which can assure our wicked subjects of impunity for their offences against himself, they having so often relapsed into them, and he having shown such a resentment of it, as soon as last year he was out of their hands, that with difficulty will they now give up to him any full liberty either of his person, or of the government and regal authority.
I pray you then, Mr. Ambassador, by reason of a rheumatic attack with which I am seized in the whole right arm, which does not permit me to write to the Queen of England, to demonstrate to her thereon on my part two things especially. The one (which she can remember well enough, having been formerly fully written to her by my son himself) that the
late Earl of Gowry, being last year on the point of having his head cut off for the same conspiracy which these Scotch lords have at present executed, deposed and confessed voluntarily to the Master of Gray, who informed me of it by letters still extant, that in England (I do not wish to mention by whom) it had been settled, projected, and determined to put me and my son to death on the same day. And that thereupon
she will consider what just reason I have to doubt of the life of my son, seeing him kept prisoner by the same persons with whom it was said such conspiracy had been arranged, who had fled to her, and, I might venture to say, were supported and maintained by her very ministers, perchance, in this last enterprise, so that she ought, it appears to me, to have very much regard not to suffer her honour to be pledged to it, or to consent to so wicked an act (which with difficulty I shall persuade myself that she ever would wish to do) but at the very least to have seen to it as she can and ought, taking upon her publicly the name of mother of my son, and taking from me entirely, in all and by all, every means of rendering him in it good offices and deeds. The other point is that, for the benefit and safety of herself, I entreat her to weigh well the proceedings of some of her principal ministers and subjects of this faction, to discover, further than she has yet made a show of knowing, the grounds of their design against me and my son, to wit, in taking the lives of us both, who are the sole remaining descendants in Scotland of the late king of England, Henry VII, to shorten their way to the usurpation of this crown, and to this effect place at their service in the said kingdom of Scotland a king who can in nothing pretend to the succession of this, but rather, by some secret league and confederacy, be beforehand obliged to assist our said enemies here to arrive at the said usurpation ; the success of which
design cannot doubtless succeed in regard of the said queen, without great diminution of her safety during her reign. For, suffering our rivals and enemies so to oppress us and remove us from between her and them, doubtless she will make them more powerful against herself, and more at liberty to make her do as shall seem good to them, as at different times she has seen herself endangered by them, I and my son not having heretofore injured her, at least by way of compensation, in restraining our said rivals in their duties towards her. Moreover, it can only be to her a dishonour and great weight of conscience, to suffer thus her own blood to be ruined, and this kingdom to be defrauded of its true and lawful inheritors,it being her right, and having it in her power, to remedy it.
If she were immortal to enjoy for ever this crown, or had to secure her own children in it, even then among politicians such an act might be received. But provided that she secures her kingdom for herself, so long as it shall please God to give her life, I cannot comprehend for what others after her she wishes to load her conscience so far as to permit us to be deprived both of life and of right, not having others among our rivals, I may say any, who have more means, power, and sin-
cere good will to serve her than me and my son, if it should please her to accept us. For to plead (as she might do) that we are the first and most to be feared by her, is not a sufficient reason, when all regard for God, faith, and honour has ceased, to get rid of us in this manner, having there so many solid and good means to assure herself in it, as she had been able to do times without number, by accepting the very advantageous offers which had been made to her, to keep faith and
duty therein, and not by the imprisonment of our persons, and such other extraordinary ways by which they have proceeded against us till this present time. The said queen ought to consider the little faith and durable safety which she has hitherto found with those particular
subjects of Scotland, who happening from time to time to drop off from her (as the justice of God has not permitted any of them long to continue), she has always been constrained to have recourse to new remedies to serve present occasions, without ever remaining sure of the future. Also it has never been the design of those who have counselled her to proceed by such means towards attaining her safety, but solely, w^ithout considering what might in it mishappen to her, to ruin by herself her kinsfolk, and the nearest of those the first ; which is the real and main cause that hitherto no treaty and agreement could succeed between her and us, however great offers, conditions, and overtures we have at different times proposed to her to that effect, especially last winter, when I dispatched my secretary to her with almost a carte blanclie, insomuch that she herself and those of her council were forced to avow and confess that they could desire nothing more or add to the terms to which I had voluntarily submitted in order to put
more than the right on my side, taking upon me to induce my son in like manner to do the same, as truly I should have done, if it had been permitted to me to send to him as I very urgently required ; the refusal which was made to me of this having too plainly shown the small inclination which some had to this agreement. For if they had been disposed to it in earnest, seeing that the said queen had written to me that it only applied to my son, she was bound, if not to aid me, at least to give me leave to labour with my said son to remove all the difficulties which were advanced in it, on her part ; and, if I had
not been successful therein, then I should have been deprived of all ground for imputing the fault of it to others. But I am of opinion that they knew^ too well that such difficulties were merely forged by the factiousness of the Earl of Arran, who now receives for it the reward of those very persons whom he has so well served against me. And I firmly believe that it would have been more honourable, better, and safer for the said queen, and as well for the said Earl of Arran and his adherents, as for these lords newly returned to Scotland, to
have secured themselves all by a firm union between me and my son, and the conclusion of the peace which I sought from the said queen, being thereby both held in consideration, than to have proceeded, as has been done, by force and violence. It is not that I wish to disapprove of the restoration of the peers who were banished here, not being for my own part able to plead any offence against them (as the said queen and
those of her council may remember well enough that by my said secretary I offered to intercede and labour in Scotland for their said restoration, even to take it as it were upon myself), but I had much rather desired that it had been procured by gentle means and with the general reconciliation which I proposed between the nobility, to establish in the said kingdom a secure rest and tranquillity for the future, than with such violence and by the support of our enemies in this kingdom ; who, under such innovations, tend but to exterminate my son and all our race. And that it might not be so is sufficiently apparent in that, if the restoration only of the said Scottish lords had been simply intended, the said queen of England might have quietly effected it for them by the great credit and the thorough good understanding which she manifested to me by all her letters to have with my son, and ought not, in reward for his being so completely united to her, to send back to him the said banished people armed to the teeth. Which was not (I am sure) one of the public articles of the
treaty made between her and him last winter, when Gray was in this country. And less ought such a thing to have been expected among the great demonstrations of friendship which the said queen had made to him all this time here, of which, so far from my having conceived any jealousy, now that I have been excepted from the said treaty after having been the first to devise and begin to act upon it, I have, on the contrary, done the utmost in my power to maintain the said queen
in this good course with my son, accounting myself very well pleased if he should receive any fruit, benefit, and advantage from it, so much have his preservation, greatness, and prosperity ever been to me more dear than any thing relating to my own private matters.
You see at last to what have come the negotiations and dealings of this young man. Gray, and of such other ministers of my son ; being himself unable to hope for any thing better in future, if once for all and substantially the said queen is not pleased, according to the overtures which I have formerly made to her in it, to mediate with the king your master, my brother-in-law, to establish a more certain and sure govern-
ment in Scotland, destroying there all seeds of differences and bygone partialities. Otherwise it will always be to begin again, as the sudden whirls and unforeseen changes which have come to pass in that country, almost every month, these last three or four years, have given to us sufficient proofs of it. Therefore to look betimes, both to the present
danger of my son's life, and to the other things which shall be found necessary in future for his safety, and the peace and quiet of his subjects, I beseech you to urge in my name to the said queen, as vigorously as you can, upon the aforesaid remonstrances, that she may be pleased to approve that with you (in case that the king, my said lord and brother, according to the request which I am resolved to make to him of it, gives you the commission, and that you wish to accept it), and with another ambassador on her own part, I may send some of
my people to my son, to communicate to him and the Parliament of the country, which for this purpose they may cause to assemble, as it is daily done for less occasions, our common advice and counsel touching the restoration of matters in that quarter. In which the king, my said lord and brother, may justly advance as much title to interfere as any other prince, being thereto obliged by the alliance so ancient between
France and Scotland, and having to it, as I believe, reserved the same right by his new league with the said queen of England. And I do not think that he can in such a journey more conveniently and xpeditiously, as there is need, employ any other than you, who are already on the road to me and to the said queen of England, to arrange with her, beforehand, the manner in which they shall proceed therein. If this
overture is not agreeable to her, you will propose, if you please, that she will permit me to send to France some of my people, properly instructed by myself to go, without any prejudice to her, to seek for other means of assisting my son, trustinoj in God not to fail therein. It will cost her nothino; in that but a passport. And I do not consider her good mitural disposition yet so dead to her own blood, that being
herself unable to assist him, she would wish to prevent the mother from relieving her child in so urgent a need ; which would be sufficient to confirm many in their opinion that this party against my son would not be hazarded without her approval or warrandice, or at least of some of her principal and most trusty ministers.
If they propose to you that I should treat of this matter by correspondence, refuse it altogether, ; as thereby my letters would pass through the hands of those who have by chance planned this enterprise, which would be always to make them more capable of bringing it to an end. And I should like as well to send my packets direct to the said Scotch, who at present detain my son, inasmuch as formerly some have been sent to them from this quarter, with full and particular advice how they ought to proceed against our designs. Moreover
my despatches, like those on the matter of my jointure, are so ill handled, and I have received from them replies so little satisfactory, that I will never undertake to treat of any affair of state or importance by the same means. I make no doubt that they will pretend to you that my son is in complete liberty and self-control. For the same they were anxious to affirm to me, and the said queen wrote to me, about three years ago, when my said son was made a prisoner in the house of the Earl of Gowry, and as such detained nearly a year by the
said Earl and some of the nobles recently returned, with so strict a guard, vigilance, and constraint on all his words and actions, both public and private, that Monsieur de La Mothe Fénélon, a wise and very prudent gentleman, on his return from the journey which he made In that quarter, wrote to me plainly in these very words : " that he had found there the king a close prisoner, the crown on the earth, and the ceptre
under the feet of his subjects." The English ambassador, who was then there, exercising nevertheless such authority, that he took the liberty of attending the audiences of the said Monsieur de La Mothe, listening to every word which my son and he said.
It is only four months since the said queen of England, wishing to excuse herself for being unable longer to admit the king your master, my brother-in-law, as caution and surety in the treaty between her and me, wrote to me with her own hand, that he was not at liberty, owing to the return to him of some of the league: who, nevertheless, from what I have since heard, had come to him disarmed, and with all the submission, duty, and obedience which he could expect from very faithful and very loving subjects, such as I believe and I shall maintain were never those of whom she intended to speak. How then
shall my son, surprised, besieged, and constrained by open force to surrender to the banished parties previously proclaimed by him as enemies, traitors, and rebels, be esteemed free ? But their subsequent proceedings would be enough to let all Christendom be aware of his captivity, although by chance covered with the appearance of a specious liberty. And therefore I now protest to the said queen, that I will
never admit or hold as the proper acts of my son, any thing which under his name may be done or passed, so long as he shall be detained in such a state. And if they shall object to me that the Earl of Arran held him in a worse imprisonment and closer captivity, the said queen must in like manner acknowledge as null all which in the time of the government of the said earl has been done and negotiated against me ; to w^hich I consider it certain that the poor child has never lent but his name. And the said earl, for having in that abused the name and authority of his said master against his own mother and queen, ought rather to be called to account, than for not having maintained and preserved the life and authority of his said master, against the Earl of Gowry and his accomplices.
As for my own private condition here, besides the endless inconveniences of which I am daily sensible, causing me thereby to pine away in sorrow, T cannot but recall to mind, on this misfortune of ray son, the designs and various attempts which have been made upon my life, since I have been in this country ; sometimes by violence ; sometimes by poison, as I have formerly made some of them known to the said queen, with the names and surnames of the managers and instruments ; sometimes by the subornation of individuals instigated to demand my life in full parliament ; and lastly by an open association, or rather conspiracy of my enemies, made public last winter, under pretext of being for the preservation of the said queen ; being strictly and in effect a ban and proclamation for indirectly finding murderers and inviting them to such a deed, assuring them, beforehand, not only of
their pardon, but also of being ever maintained by the said conspirators. Such sinister proceedings, from which it has
pleased God to preserve me till now, and the little safety which I see in my present state, even if the said queen of England were to die, give me, I think, very sufficient cause for requiring from her, more earnestly and importunately than ever, my complete deliverance from so long, rigorous, and miserable a captivity, not so much for the mere sake of the preservation of my life (which, saving the will of my God, I have very little cause and occasion to desire to prolong), as to pass the little which remains to me in liberty of my conscience, and more rest and quiet of mind than I have been able hitherto to manage and acquire by incredible patience, very sincere duty and endeavours, in which I am driven at the last to humour the said queen, and for once assure myself of her friendship by my deserts. I beg you then to make her this request for my liberation, assisting it with all the favourable recommendation which you can in the name of the king, my bro
ther-in-law, to whom., as I have always hitherto deferred the principal mediation of every treaty and agreement between the said queen of England and me, so I will still accept in this all such conditions as he and the queen, my mother-in-law, shall judge, with my honour and safety, to be reasonable, being very content to leave my cause in their hands. On the side of Scotland, no difficulty can at present come in the way of this treaty ; matters there being in such a position that I do not think that the said queen of England would be there opposed in any of her designs, so that it will not now be the fault of any but herself, if by the means aforesaid she does not establish matters there more firmly and durably to her satisfaction, and secure herself entirely in her own country, for the common good, peace, and prosperity of all this island, both during her reign and after it.
Excuse, if you please, the importunity and length of this letter, having deemed it necessary to assist the little information which you have of my affairs by such ample intelligence. I was also about to send to you a concise memorial of my last more important negotiations with the said queen, but I have deferred it until by her reply I shall learn whether it shall be expedient for you to proceed farther. And in the meanwhile I pray to God that he may have you, Mr. Ambassador, in his high and holy keeping.
From Tutbury, this 8th December, 1585. [12]
,December 8, 1756: "George Godlip" was granted 25 acres in Lancaster Co., PA by the Penn family, owners of Pennsylvania.[13] PENNSYLVANIA records of June 25, 1754 indicate that a George Gotlieb received a warrant for 25 acres in Lancaster Co. He received another warrant on May 29, 1755 for 20 acres and on March 3, 1756 he enlisted in Major James Burd's Co., First Regiment of Foot, to serve in the French and Indian War. This information is from PA. Archives Ser. 5, Vol. 1, pp. 60, 61, 78, which gives the muster rolls for Burd's company. It contains the following information: George Gotlieb, age 45, place of birth, Germany, rank Sergeant. Two different muster rolls list his name as Gotlieb and alternately as Gotlip. Burd, very considerately, also kept a detailed journal (some of which is reprinted in the PA. Archives, Ser. 2, Vol II, pp. 641-661,) which tells us that the regiment arrived at Fort Augusta (PA) on December 8, 1756 to complete construction on the fort. (This fort is located on the north fork of the Susquehanna River in Northumberland County just in the present town of Sunbury, PA). It was a tough winter, and Burd was beset with many difficulties, including delayed payments to his troops (along with the threat of Indian attacks, snow, cold, illness and resulting desertions). On March 7, 1757 he delivered a pep talk to the troops in which he berated some for their complaining and extolled the virtues of a few loyal determined souls who did their job without complaint. Among the latter, he cited Sergeant George Gotlieb for continuing duty beyond the date of his required enlistment. Not all of Burd's journal is included, but in that which is published, I find no further mention of George Gotlieb; however, on March 2, 1757, William Denny, Governor of Pensylvania sent notification to Col. Burd that he was to limit all enrollments to three-year enlistments and that he was not to enroll any men older than age thirty-five. Obviously, George was way over the age limit, so perhaps, this would have been the reason for end of his military duties.[14]
December 8, 1771; George Washington Journal: (nephew of the wife of the 1st cousin 10x removed)After breakfast Mr. Pendleton and Mr. Crawford (6th great grandfather)went away.[15]
“December 8, 1777: - There were many reports that a large corps of aemy was between here and Germantown and therefore, the entire me moved out, from this morning until this afternoon, They had advanced as far as Chestnut Hill and Poesysound but encountered the aicany in a situation so well-fortified by nature and design, that the unnmanding general decided that an attack would not succeed. [16]
December 8, 1778
Head Quarters Fort Lawrance Decr 8
officer of the day To day Major Springer (Hugh Springer husband of the 5th great grandmother)
officer of the day Tomorrow Col° Beeler
at a General Court Martial of the Militia line held the Sixth &
7th Instant whereof Lieu* Col° morrow was president Cap* Isaac
pearce of Col° Stephonsons (Hugh Stephenson , half 6th great granduncle) Regt was Tried for dealing with the Indians Contrary to apositive general order to which Cap* Pearce
pleads Guilty and Confesseth he give an Indian a Shirt and Three
Dollars for two Deer Skins which he atempted not only to Justify
But uplauded himself for as well as any other person who would
in the Same manner Openly open and Disobey Orders given for the
Regulation and Saftey of the Army Unless he or such persons
approved of them Or rather if they did not Suit there own Intrested
Vicious and Selfish Inclinations, with Some Iliberal and fals
aspertions On the General. The Court taking the Case of Capt
pearce into Consideration Sentence him Only to make A proper
Aknowledgement of his fault To the General in presence of the
president of the Court, and to be then Reprimanded for his Breach
of General Orders, as the General knows and has a high Opinion
of some Gentlemen of this Court is Extremely Sorry his duty
Obledges him to disaprov[e] of the Sentence of the Court and
Continues Capt pearce under Areast. as Such Examples Especaly
with Impunity would be attended with the worst of Consequences
hereafter & the more as he apears to have so many Advocates
which Sullies the Generals good Conduct of Militia So much aproved
of and auplauded almost on every Occasion Since they have been
in the Service 47[17] & at another Court martial from the Continental
line whereof Major Vernon was president Serj1 Jn° Aspie of the
light dragoons was tried for the same Crime, that is dealing with
the Indians Contrary to a positive General Order to which he pleads
Guilty and Confesseth he Give an Indian the Buttons off his Coat
for two Fawn Skins . the Court Sentenced him to be redused to a
private Sentinel and receive Twenty lashes on his Bare Back but
Recomends him to the Generals Clemencey on Ace1of his
Former good Conduct the General highly aproves the Sentence but
at the request of officers who have Shewn Such Regard for the
Esentials of the Service they are Engaged in Omits the whipping,
although we feal the Efects of Such bad Examples Already: Serj*
M'Cormick of Capt Ferrals Company is also discharg.d and the Court
disolv.d all the Troops are to be Serv.d with Two days
more Flour Except Col° Gibsons Reg1 who Remains in the fort48[18]
and prepare Imeiadately to march without any Stope or delay untill
they reach Fort MTNtosh all persons are alowd to go out and in
without passes To day to hunt there horses
Paroal Madrid C. Sign Minorca
[Concluded] [19]
December 8, 1778: Isaac Pierce was a captain in Stephenson's Regiment. Kellogg, Frontier
Advance, 450 (Orderly Book of the 8th Pennsylvania Regt., December 8, 1778).
December 8, 1829
Perhaps the most controversial aspect of Andrew Jackson's (2nd cousin 8x removed) presidency was his policy regarding American Indians. Jackson was a leading advocate of a policy known as Indian removal, which involved the ethnic cleansing of several Indian tribes. In his December 8, 1829 First Annual Message to Congress, Jackson stated:
“This emigration should be voluntary, for it would be as cruel as unjust to compel the aborigines to abandon the graves of their fathers and seek a home in a distant land. But they should be distinctly informed that if they remain within the limits of the States they must be subject to their laws. In return for their obedience as individuals they will without doubt be protected in the enjoyment of those possessions which they have improved by their industry.”[20]
December 8, 1838: Obit. For Samuel Vance(1st cousin 8x removed) b. 1749, d. December 8, 1838. In the vicinity of the evening of the 8th inst. Samuel Vance, Sr. in the 89th year of his age. The deceased was one of the oldest settlers in the country. He emigrated from Frederick County in this state some time in the year 1773, has resided on the farm where he died, near 65 years. He was engaged in most of the scrapes which took place with the Indians in those dark times and in the fall of 1780 he joined a regiment under the command of Colonel William Campbell, marched into South Carolina and was present when the British and Tories were so completely used up at the memorable little battle of King's Mountain, of which event he has always been fond of talking. He would laugh heartily while relating the anecdote of the British officer who wrote to his friends in England that the detachment under Major Ferguson had been surrounded and cut to pieces in the mountains by a savage horde dressed in long hunting shirts, with long teeth, etc. Like most of the farmer's sons of those days, the deceased received a very limited education, but he had a good mind and an extraordinary memory, was fond of reading and perhaps there were few men among the yeomanry of our country who were better read in ancient and modern history, or who had a better knowledge of the affairs of our government and the world at large. As a husband, father and friend he had few equals, and though he was somewhat eccentric in his manners, he yet possessed in a high degree that amiable trait of human character -- a bevalent (sic) heart. Fro 60 or 70 years he was a hard laborin man and during his long life enjoyed more than an ordinary share of good health. His late illness (which he bore with uncommon fortitude) was nothing more than the struggle of a powerful constitution with old age. He passed quietly and calmly from the troubles of this world to that bourne from which no traveller returns.Ancestors of Forrest Roger Garnett pp. 1820.28-29.
Re: please explain the godlove/didawick of Hardy County WV
Donna (View posts)
Posted: April 5, 2005 10:44PM GMT
Classification: Query
Surnames: GODLOVE, SMART
Jacob Godlove and Louisa Smart are part of my Smart family.
My info differs slightly from yours. Louisa born May 18, 1821, VA. Married December 8, 1842. I have 10 children for them but no names. Do you have children's names. Thanks.
Re: please explain the godlove/didawick of Hardy County WV
jan (View posts)
Posted: April 7, 2005 5:55PM GMT
Classification: Query
Surnames:
i have no names. you can contact however, donna godlove. she has info on the internet in reference to the godloves. if you go under godlove ancestry message boards you will find her there. sorry
Donna Godlove, please read this
jan didawick (View posts)
Posted: April 23 2006 4:14PM GMT
Classification: Query
Surnames:
Donna, hi this is Jan Didawick. I emailed you a couple of years ago about the Didawick ancestry. I finally am able to give the information that I have worked on for the last two years in reference to the Didawick Heritage. If you would like a copy of it I will email it to you. Please contact me at Fawnie2@verizon.net. Thanks.[21]
Descendants of Jacob Dietwig
Generation No. 1
1. Jacob2 Dietwig (Stephan1) was born 1766 in Shenandoah County, Virginia, and died 1842. He married (1)
Elizabeth Louder Nov 18, 1791. She died 1800. He married (2) Catherine Speigler Sep 07, 1801.
Notes for Jacob Dietwig:
Jacob's father named Jacob in a deed in which he deeds his land to his son on the condition that he pay money to his
sister. This deed is recorded in Shenandoah Co. Will Book "O" p. 218-3 Apr 1803 deeds to Jacob the "house where I
(Stephan) now lives and all my land and to pay 150 pounds to equally divided between his sisters, herein namedoldest
to youngest". "Mary, Barbara, Margaret, Elizabeth, Susanna, Magdalena, Rebecca, Sarah and Rachel. Also pay
12 pounds to Joseph Shoe, husband of my daughter, Catherine deceased."
On June 12, 1778 Jacob and his wife received the holy communion at their church.
Children of Jacob Dietwig and Elizabeth Louder are:
+ 2 i. Henry3 Didawick, born 1792; died May 04, 1869.
+ 3 ii. Susanna Deadewick, born in Shenandoah County, Virginia.
Generation No. 2
2. Henry3 Didawick (Jacob2 Dietwig, Stephan1) was born 1792, and died May 04, 1869. He married Elizabeth
Godlove 1820, daughter of Francis Godlove and Mary Maria. She was born in Hampshire Co, WV, and died Bet. 1840 -
1850.
Notes for Henry Didawick:
Henry served in the War of 1812 in Captain John Links Va. Militia. He lived in Wardensville, WV.
Children of Henry Didawick and Elizabeth Godlove are:
4 i. Joseph4 Didawick, born 1821; died Bet. 1880 - 1900.
5 ii. Judge Jacob Didawick, born Oct 06, 1822; died Jan 10, 1909.
6 iii. Susan Didawick, born May 06, 1827; died Jan 11, 1911.
+ 7 iv. Abraham Didawick, born May 29, 1829; died Feb 12, 1905.
+ 8 v. Stephen A Didawick, born 1831; died 1877.
+ 9 vi. John Henry Didawick, born 1833; died Apr 02, 1876.
+ 10 vii. Benjamin F. Didawick, born 1835 in Shenandoah County Va; died Jan 20, 1920 in Wardensville, WV.[22]
December 8 and 9, 1855: James H. Lane and Charles Robinson brokered a truce with Governor Wilson Shannon. Thereafter both sides disbanded, and the war came to an official end. Soon, however, renewed violence erupted between free-state and proslavery settlers in Douglas County. George W. Brown's free-state newspaper in Lawrence, the Herald of Freedom, had long been a source of bitter contempt to the proslavery forces operating in Kansas. [23]
December 8, 1860: Children of Lucinda Smith (5th cousin 6x removed) and James Wright:
+ . i. John Thomas Wright (b. December 8, 1860 in GA / d. October 8, 1942)
B. Children of Lucinda Smith and Tyrone Patterson:
+ . i. James Marion Patterson (b. November 23, 1867 in GA / d. February 8, 1936)
+ . ii. Sarah Eller Patterson (b. February 24, 1869 in GA / d. July 5, 1953 in GA)
. iii. Martha Ella Patterson (b. abt. 1872 in GA / d. unk)
+ . iv. Robert Newton Patterson (b. March 6, 1874 in GA / d. June 6, 1943)
+ . v. Joseph Trion Patterson (b. March 17, 1876 in GA / d. September 16, 1949)[24]
December 8, 1863: Dr. William McKinnon Goodlove (1st cousin, 3 times removed) and the 57th Ohio .Volunteer Infantry March to relief of Knoxville, Tenn., November 28-December 8. 1863: [25]
December 8, 1863
President Lincoln issues a proclamation of amnesty and reconstruction, offering to pardon anyone taking part in the rebellion who will take a loyalty oath.[26]
Thurs. December 8, 1864
Clear and cold detailed on picket on
Reserve post with Capt Nott
Very cold night
William Harrison Goodlove (2nd great grandfather) Civil War Diary
December 8, 1865: Lady Augusta Gordon (18th cousin 4x removed)
November 17,1803
December 8, 1865
Married two times, had issue.
[27]
December 8, 1887
The American Federation of Labor is established with Samuel Gompers as its first President.[28]
December 8, 1887: William Bryer Rowell (5th cousin 5x removed)13 [Arminda Smith12, Gabriel D. Smith11, Gabriel Smith10, John “LR” Smith9, Ambrose J. Smith8, Christopher Smith7, Christopher Smith6, Thomas Smythe5, Thomas Smythe4, John Smythe3, Richard2, William1] (b. June 12, 1867 in Carroll Co GA / d. February 7, 1955 in Carroll Co GA) married Victoria Lee (b. February 4, 1870 in Carroll Co GA / d. June 4, 1940 in Carroll Co GA) on December 8, 1887 in Carroll Co. GA.
A. Children of William Rowell and Victoria Lee:
. i. Grover Rowell (b. December 25, 1892 in GA / d. February 5, 1971 in GA)
. ii. Margaret Rowell (b. May 15, 1896 in GA)
. iii. Leonard Rowell (b. May 5, 1899 in GA / d. September 12, 1906 in GA)
. iv. Minnie Lee Rowell (b. April 15, 1904 / d. April 14, 1947)
. v. Eva Rowell (b. February 12, 1906 in GA / d. April 17, 1947)
. vi. Lloyd Rowell (b. October 23, 1909 in GA / d. June 7, 1947 in GA)
More about Grover Rowell
Grover married Ellen Arrington on August 15, 1915 in Carroll Co. GA.[29]
1888: The Secret Doctrine by H. P. Blavatsky is published. [30] An Austrian writer, Guido Van Liste, picks up Blavatski’s idea of an Aryan race. Blavatski rewrote history, Liste rewrote geography.[31]
December 8, 1898
(Jordan’s Grove) Mrs Margorie Goodlove (2nd cousin 1x removed) is sewing for Mrs. Dunn this week.[32]
1899
In a famous Harper’s Magazine article published in 1899, Mark Twain noted with some amazement that world Jewry, but 0.25 percent of the human race, was “a nebulous dim puff of stardust lost in the blaze of the Milky way. Properly, the Jew ought hardly to be heard of; but he is heard of, has always been heard of. He is as prominent on the planet as any other people, and his importance is extravagantly out of proportion to the smallness of his bulk…What is the secret of his immortality?” he asked.[33]
1899
Houston Stewart Chamberlain, racist and anti-Semitic author, publishes his ‘Die Grundlagen des 19 Jahrhunderts’ which later became a basis of National-Socialist ideology.[34]
1899
Blood libel in Bohemia (the Hilsner case).[35]
1899
[36]
December 8, 1921: John Thurman Pickelsimer14 (7th cousin 4x removed) [Susan D. Cavender13, Emily H. Smith12, Gideon Smith11, Gabriel Smith10, John “LR” Smith9, Ambrose J. Smith8, Christopher Smith7, Christopher Smith6, Thomas Smythe5, Thomas Smythe4, John Smythe3, Richard2, William1] (b. May 10, 1891 in Fannin Co. GA / d. May 1, 1970 in Clayton Co. GA) married Gladys Louise Mains (b. September 7, 1901 in Cumberland Co. MA / d. April 1981 in Henry Co. GA) on July 18, 1919.
A. Children of John Pickelsimer and Gladys Mains:
+ . i. John Thurman Pickelsimer (b. December 8, 1921 in Fulton Co. GA)
+ . ii. Hazel Ann Pickelsimer (b. November 23, 1923 in Polk Co. GA)[38]
December 8, 1921 – November 13, 2005
Zella M. Goodlove (wife of the granduncle)
Birth:
December 8, 1921
Death:
November 13, 2005
http://www.findagrave.com/icons2/trans.gif
w/o Willard M., parent of David J.
married 10/20/1940
Family links:
Spouses:
Willard M. Goodlove (1919 - ____)*
Willard M. Goodlove (1919 - 2012)*
*Calculated relationship
Burial:
Jordans Grove Cemetery
Central City
Linn County
Iowa, USA
Created by: Gail Wenhardt
Record added: Apr 04, 2011
Find A Grave Memorial# 67904154
Zella M. Goodlove
Added by: Gail Wenhardt
Zella M. Goodlove
Cemetery Photo
Added by: Jackie L. Wolfe
December 8/9, 1941: 26,500 Latvian Jews were murdered in the woods of Rumbula by members of the SS and the police as well as Latvian volunteers.[39]
December 8, 1941:
53
Young Japanese Americans, including several Army selectees, gather around a reporter's car in the Japanese section of San Francisco, December 8, 1941. (AP Photo) #
December 8, 1941:
58
A crowd tries to enter the House of Representatives to hear President Franklin Roosevelt speak, December 8, 1941, in Washington. (AP Photo) #
December 8, 1941
59
President Franklin D. Roosevelt, appearing before a joint session of Congress termed as unprovoked and dastardly the attack by Japan upon Hawaii and the Philippines and asked for an immediate declaration of war, December 8, 1941. (AP Photo) #
December 8, 1941
60
Tense faces of Congressmen, cabinet members, Supreme Court justices, crowded galleries looked to a grim President Franklin D. Roosevelt as he asked for war against Japan, said: "With confidence in our armed forces - with the unbounding determination of our people - we will gain the inevitable triumph - so help us, God." President Roosevelt spoke in the House of Representatives, addressing a joint session of Congress, December 8, 1941. (AP Photo) #
December 8, 1941
• The United States declares war on Japan following the Japanese surprise attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7.[40] Malaya and Thailand are invaded by the Japanese.[41]
December 8, 1941: The first transport of Jews arrives at the Chelmo extermination camp, and transports continue to arrive until March 1943. The camp reopened for operation in April 1944. About 320,000 Jews were killed at Chelmno.[42]
December 8, 1941 Four thousand Jews of Novogrudok are killed.[43]
December 8, 1941: The Arajs Commando return. Jews are lined up in columns of 1,000 and marched to Rumbula. They were then stripped of their clothes and luggage. Twelve German marksmen work in shifts. Roughly 16 are killed every minute. Twelve thousand are murdered on the first day. The killing is far from over. The shooting finally stopped at 7:45 pm in the evening. Known as bloody Sunday, it is the second largest single massacre of Jews in WWII. [44]
December 8, 1942: Abraham Esau was appointed on December 8, 1942 as Hermann Göring’s Bevollmächtigter (plenipotentiary) for nuclear physics research under the RFR.[45]
December 8, 1945: **. John Thurman Pickelsimer 8th cousin 3x removed), Jr.15 [John Pickelsimer14, Susan D. Cavender13, Emily H. Smith12, Gideon Smith11, Gabriel Smith10, John “LR” Smith9, Ambrose J. Smith8, Christopher Smith7, Christopher Smith6, Thomas Smythe5, Thomas Smythe4, John Smythe3, Richard2, William1] (b. 8 Dec 1921 in Fulton Co. GA) married Evelyn Louise Rawlins (b. November 7, 1925 in Fulton Co GA / d. February 23, 1962 in Riverside, CA) on December 8, 1945. He also married Inez Caudle Wright on August 25, 1972.
A. Children of John Pickelsimer and Evelyn Rawlins:
+ . i. Living Pickelsimer
+ . ii. Living Pickelsimer
+ . iii. Living Pickelsimer
December 8, 1965
Dennis Maxson points out that today beef stew is on the menu and also that he felt Roger Maris’ older brother Rudy was even better than his younger brother when he played baseball with them growing up in Fargo North Dakota.
Roger Maris was traded on December 8, 1966 to the St Louis Cardinals. He was traded by the Yankees to the St. Louis Cardinals for Charley Smith. Maris played his final two seasons with the Cardinals, helping to win the 1967 and 1968 pennants. He was outstanding in the 1967 World Series, hitting .385 with one home run and seven RBIs. It was the best performance of his seven career World Series.[12] Maris hit his 275th and final regular season home run on September 5, 1968. It was his 25th career two-run homer.[13][46]
Posted on: Saturday, December 8, 2001
Punchbowl service links past to present
By Will Hoover
Advertiser Staff Writer
James Coleman and his wife remember Dec. 7, 1941, during ceremonies at Punchbowl. Coleman was a platoon sergeant stationed at Fort Shafter during the Pearl Harbor attack.
Jeff Widener • The Honolulu Advertiser
After a week of reflection, celebration and reverie, it got down to one thing yesterday for more than 3,000 people who came to National Memorial Cemetery of the Pacific, at Punchbowl.
Time to say thanks to those who survived and those who paid the ultimate price at Pearl Harbor on Dec. 7, 1941.
"It's an obligation for us as survivors to come here and honor the men who didn't make it that morning," said survivor Howard Snell, (uncle) 78, of Houston.
Former Marine Marvin Stearns, 75, had come to say thanks to guys like Snell.
"I wasn't at Pearl Harbor," said Stearns. "But I fought in the Pacific in World War II. These guys are our heroes, though. We didn't have it rough at all compared to them."
Amazing sentiments for a man who lived through Iwo Jima and Okinawa and then survived the Korean War.
No sooner did busloads of survivors and their families begin to arrive at around 9 a.m. than the drizzle subsided, the clouds parted and the sun began to shine. Flags at half-staff fluttered.
Present were members of Congress, Medal of Honor recipients, representatives of numerous military associations, 325 family members of World Trade Center victims from New York, and at least one Hollywood actor, former Marine Hugh O'Brian. The military brass contingent reached all the way to Richard Myers, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, who was among the speakers.
Yesterday was a moment six decades in the making, began keynote speaker Robin Higgins, the U.S. undersecretary for memorial affairs. Like others, Higgins drew parallels between Pearl Harbor and the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon.
"Your lives were forever changed by an event so devastating that it would not be for another 60 years, Sept. 11, 2001, that America would again feel the tragic shock waves of an attack on our home soil," she said. "Perhaps the events of Sept. 11 resonated in your lives in ways that did not resonate among other younger Americans."
Higgins is familiar with such feelings herself. Her husband, Marine Col. William "Rich" Higgins, was murdered by terrorists in Lebanon in 1988.
Speaking directly to the survivors, Higgins concluded by saying, "I need not ask that God bless America; because of you, he already has."
A traditional laying of the wreath, 21-cannon salute and B-52 bomber flyover followed her address.
Watching quietly from the sideline, all alone, was Wetzel Sanders, 78, a bus driver from Midkiff, W.Va. Sanders arrived in Honolulu on Monday for the first time since he was shipped out to Guadalcanal in 1942. His wife of 54 years, Kathleen, is in poor health and could not make the trip with him.
Sanders was stationed with the 251st Coast Artillery Anti-Aircraft Regiment at Camp Malakole near 'Ewa Beach when the Japanese attacked. After unsuccessfully trying to shoot down a Zero with a Springfield rifle, he and his buddies drove a pickup to Pearl Harbor and set up anti-aircraft guns by the hospital. His company was credited with shooting down three enemy planes.
"I couldn't hardly recognize a thing when I returned to Pearl Harbor," said Sanders, who took a private trip to the USS Arizona Memorial on Wednesday. "I'm a pretty rugged guy. But I have to admit, I did get a little choked up at that sight."[47]
December 8, 2007
While driving from Texas A&M where Jacqulin had played in a college showcase soccer tournament, my dad spied this road sign between College Station and Tomball TX. It illustrates the importance of Texas as a supplier of men and materials to the Confederate war effort. Photo, Jeffery Goodlove, December 8, 2007.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] wikipedia
[2] Footnotes[edit]
1. ^ David Starkey, Holbein's Irish Sitter, The Burlington Magazine, May 1981
2. ^ On 22 February 1538, the earldom of Ormond was restored to Piers Butler, 8th Earl of Ormond
3. ^ Richardson 2004, p. 180.
4. ^ Ives, Eric (2004). The Life and Death of Anne Boleyn. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. p. 3.
5. ^ Wilkinson, Josephine (2009). Mary Boleyn, The True Story of Henry VIII's favourite mistress. Amberley Publishing. p. 17.
6. ^ Wilkinson, Josephine (2009). pp. 20–22. Missing or empty |title= (help)
7. ^ List of the Knights of the Garter (1348–present)
8. ^ Cokayne 1949, p. 51
9. ^ Stanley Bertram Chrimes, Henry VII, pg 138
10. ^ Cokayne 1959, p. 739.
11. ^ Cokayne 1959, p. 51.
12. ^ Cokayne 1959, p. 51; Cokayne 1945, pp. 141–142.
13. ^ Davies 2008; Cokayne 1945, pp. 141–142.
14. ^ a b c d Jonathan Hughes, ‘Boleyn, Thomas, earl of Wiltshire and earl of Ormond (1476/7–1539)’, Oxford Dictionary of National Biography, Oxford University Press, 2004; online edn, Oct 2007.
References
•Block, Joseph S. (2004). Boleyn, George, Viscount Rochford (c.1504–1536), courtier and diplomat. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
•Cokayne, George Edward (1949). The Complete Peerage, edited by Geoffrey H. White XI. London: St. Catherine Press. p. 51.
•Cokayne, George Edward (1945). The Complete Peerage, edited by H.A. Doubleday X. London: St. Catherine Press. pp. 137–142.
•Hughes, Jonathan (2007). Boleyn, Thomas, earl of Wiltshire and earl of Ormond (1476/7–1539), courtier and nobleman. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
•Ives, E.W. (2004). Anne (Anne Boleyn) (c.1500–1536), queen of England, second consort of Henry VIII. Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
•Richardson, Douglas (2004). Plantagenet Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, ed. Kimball G. Everingham. Baltimore, Maryland: Genealogical Publishing Company Inc. p. 180.
Weir, Alison (1991). The Six Wives of Henry VIII. New York: Grove Weidenfeld.
[3] * This is the precise date. I found, in the State Paper Office,
London, an autograph letter from Mary in 1584, wherein she says,
" The 8th of December, my forty -second birthday T
[4] http://archive.org/stream/lettersofmarystu00mary/lettersofmarystu00mary_djvu.txt
[5] Wikipedia
[6] Wikipedia
[7] http://archive.org/stream/lettersofmarystu00mary/lettersofmarystu00mary_djvu.txt
[8] [^Draught. — State Paper Office, London, Mary Queen of Scots ^ vol. xiv.]
[9] http://archive.org/stream/lettersofmarystu00mary/lettersofmarystu00mary_djvu.txt
[10] http://www.tudor-history.com/about-tudors/tudor-timeline/
[11] [Cotemporary Copy. — State Paper Office, London ; Mary Queen of Scots, vol. xvi.]
[12] http://archive.org/stream/lettersofmarystu00mary/lettersofmarystu00mary_djvu.txt
[13] http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~cutlip/database/America.html
[14] http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/d/e/r/Irene-Deroche/WEBSITE-0001/UHP-0585.html
[15] (From River Clyde to Tymochtee and Col. William Crawford, by Grace U. Emahiser, 1969, page 119.)
[16] Lieutenant Rueffer, Enemy Views by Bruce Burgoyne, pgs. 244-245.
[17] This trial, defense, and verdict of the court of officers all give a picture of the
feeling of the militiamen in relation to the growing unpopularity of General
Mclntosh which finally led to his recall. Open hostility, even mutiny of the
Ohio County Militia, and Broadhead's letter to Washington, January 16, 1779.
Kellogg, Frontier Advance (from the Washington Papers), 200.
[18] 48 See note 37, above, for Gibson's heroic command of the little garrison of 150
enlisted men and officers, totalling 172, during the terrible winter at Fort
Laurens. Kellogg, Frontier Advance, 186, 189, 409.
[19] AN ORDERLY BOOK OF MCINTOSH's EXPEDITION, 1778 11Robert McCready's Journal
[20] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andrew_Jackson#Early_life_and_career
[21] http://boards.ancestry.co.uk/thread.aspx?mv=flat&m=26&p=surnames.godlove
[22] http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/d/i/d/Jan-C-Didawick-Berkeley-Springs/PDFGENE3.pdf
[23] http://www.genuinekansas.com/history_samuel_j_jones_sheriff_kansas.htm
[24] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe.
[25] History of Logan County and Ohio, O.L. Basking & Co., Chicago, 1880. page 692.
[26] On This Day in America by John Wagman.
[27] Wikipedia
[28]On This day in America by John Wagman.
[29] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe.
[30] Hitler and the Occult, 11/05/2007 NTGEO
[31] Hitler and the Occult, 11/05/2007 NTGEO
[32] Winton Goodlove papers.
[33] “Abraham’s Children” Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People by Jon Entine, pg 241.
[34]www.wikipedia.org
[35]www.wikipedia.org
[36] Art Museum in Austin, TX. February 11, 2012
[37] Art Museum in Austin, TX. February 11, 2012
[38] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe
[39] The History of the Deportation of Jewish citizens to Riga in 1941/1942. Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Scheffler
[40]On This Day in America by John Wagman.
[41] Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor, page 1769
[42] Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor, page 1769
[43] Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor, page 1769
[44] Nazi Collaborators, MIL, Hitlers’ Executioner, 11/8/2011.
[45] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_nuclear_energy_project
[46] Wikipedia
[47] http://the.honoluluadvertiser.com/article/2001/Dec/08/ln/ln20a.html
No comments:
Post a Comment