https://www.facebook.com/ThisDayInGoodloveHistory
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jeff-Goodlove/323484214349385
Join me on http://www.linkedin.com/
Jeff Goodlove email address: Jefferygoodlove@aol.com
Surnames associated with the name Goodlove have been spelled the following different ways; Cutliff, Cutloaf, Cutlofe, Cutloff, Cutlove, Cutlow, Godlib, Godlof, Godlop, Godlove, Goodfriend, Goodlove, Gotleb, Gotlib, Gotlibowicz, Gotlibs, Gotlieb, Gotlob, Gotlobe, Gotloeb, Gotthilf, Gottlieb, Gottliebova, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlow, Gutfrajnd, Gutleben, Gutlove
The Chronology of the Goodlove, Godlove, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlieb (Germany, Russia, Czech etc.), and Allied Families of Battaile, (France), Crawford (Scotland), Harrison (England), Jackson (Ireland), Jefferson, LeClere (France), Lefevre (France), McKinnon (Scotland), Plantagenets (England), Smith (England), Stephenson (England?), Vance (Ireland from Normandy), Washington, Winch (England, traditionally Wales), including correspondence with George Rogers Clark, and including ancestors William Henry Harrison, Andrew Jackson, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Adams, John Quincy Adams and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Martin Van Buren, Teddy Roosevelt, U.S. Grant, Benjamin Harrison “The Signer”, Benjamin Harrison, Jimmy Carter, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, William Taft, and John Tyler (10th President), James Polk (11th President)Zachary Taylor, Abraham Lincoln
The Goodlove Family History Website:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/g/o/o/Jeffery-Goodlove/index.html
The Goodlove/Godlove/Gottlieb families and their connection to the Cohenim/Surname project:
• New Address! http://wwwfamilytreedna.com/public/goodlove/default.aspx
• • Books written about our unique DNA include:
• “Abraham’s Children, Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People” by Jon Entine.
•
• “ DNA & Tradition, The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews” by Rabbi Yaakov Kleiman, 2004.
“Jacob’s Legacy, A Genetic View of Jewish History” by David B. Goldstein, 2008.
Birthdays on this Day, January 2…
Lee A. Armstrong
Ruth Connell Ross
William M. Davidson
Bryan C. Gunn
Peter Kirby
Janet K. Marugg
Helen McCormick
Zillah McKinnon Davidson
Mary E. Moore Waits
Thomas Munn
Beulah M. Wesley Chrisman
January 2, 69 - Roman Lower Rhine army proclaims its commander, Vitellius, emperor[1]
January 2, 366 - The Alamanni cross the frozen Rhine River in large numbers, invading the Roman Empire. [2]
January 2, 533 - John II begins his reign as Catholic Pope[3]
January 2, 1012: Jewish mourners were attacked at a funeral in Egypt.[4]
1013: ABU-L-QASIM
Latin names: Abulcasis, Albucasis, Alsaharavius. Khalaf ibn Abbas al-Zahrawi, from Zahra, near Cordova, where he flourished and died c. 1013. The greatest Muslim surgeon. Physician to al-Hakam II (961 to 976). His great medical encyclopedia in 30 sections, al-Tasrif (Vade-mecum) contains interesting methods of preparing drugs by sublimation and distillation. but its most important part is the surgical, in three books, largely based upon Paulos Aegineta. Great importance attached to cauterization and styptics. Parts of the surgery are devoted to obstetrics and to the surgical treatment of the eyes, ears, and teeth. This work was illustrated with views of the surgical instruments. It was early translated into Latin (by Gherardo Cremonese), Provencal and Hebrew. Muslim prejudices against surgery stifled Abu-l-Qasim's fame in Islam, but in the Christian world his prestigue was soon immense.
Wustenfled: Geschichte der Arabischen Aerschen (p. 85, 1840). [5]
1013: Danes become masters of England as Ethelred flees to Normandy, Danes conquer England, Sweyn lands in England and is proclaimed king – Ethelred flees to Normandy, Dane Sweyn Forkbeard seizes England, new king, Aethelred flees to Normandy. [6]
1014: Basil II of Byzantine empire defeats Bulgarians, Rajendra I becomes ruler of Cholas who dominate India, Brian Boru, high king of all Ireland defeats Vikings, but is killed after victory, Brian Boru of Ireland defeats Vikings at Clontarf, but is slain, death of Samuel Czar of Bulgaria, death of Sweyn of Denmark and Sweden – succeeded by Canute – Ethelred returns to England, on Henry’s second Italian campaign he is crowned emperor in Rome, end of Norse rule in Ireland at battle at Clontarf, Western Bulgaria ceded to Byzantium, Basil II has Bulgarian army blinded, Japanese author Murasaki Shikibu dies, End of Sweyn Forkbeard King of Denmark – English recall Ethelred II as king and Canute retreats to Denmark, Sveyn Forkbeard dies, Canute (son)king of Denmark. Aethelred restored to the throne, Danes under Svein Forkbeard conquer England. [7]
January 2, 1235 - Emperor Joseph II orders Jews of Galicia Austria to adopt family names.[8]
On January 2, 1492 Isabella and Ferdinand entered Granada to receive the keys of the city and the principal mosque was reconsecrated as a church.[83] The Treaty of Granada was signed later that year, and in it Ferdinand and Isabella gave their word to allow the Muslims and Jews of Granada to live in peace. However they broke their promise soon after, and then began the Inquisition.[citation needed][dubious – discuss] [9]
January 2, 1492: The Reconquista was completed as the emirate of Granada, the last Moorish stronghold in Spain, surrendered to the forces under the command of Ferdinand and Isabella. The fall of Granada added even more Jews to Catholic Spain. Under the terms of surrender, the Jewish inhabitants were promised protection by the King and Queen. Within a few months these most Catholic Monarchs would break their word when Ferdinand ordered “the razing of the Jewish quarter. Nine months from the fall of Granada, the Sephardim will be banned from their ancestral homeland.[10]
January 2, 1492: Nearly eight centuries of Islamic rule in Iberia ended in January 1492, after eight years of battle, when the last Muslim king of Granada, Boabdil, surrendered the keys to the city to Queen Isabella herself. It was the end of Moorish Spain. According to legend, Boabdil gave one glance back at his lost dominion as he fled the city, the moment preserved in the name of a nearby hill, El Ultimo Suspiro del Moro, the Moor’s Last Sigh. The loss of Al Andalus, Andalusia, cut a deep wound in the historical consciousness of Muslims.[11]
January 2, 1710
A deed, made January 2, 1710, by Andrew Harrison and his wife Elizabeth Battaile, shows that she is the Elizabeth Battaile for whom he was guardian, and who later became his wife. In John Battaile's will, he bequeathed three hundred acres of land “I bought of Mr. Samp.
Darrell to her & her heirs forever”, to my daughter Elizabeth. In the deed to f9llow, made as above,’ Andrew Harrison and his wife Elizabeth Harrison—’ ‘one hundred and fifty acres . . . being part of a dividend of land formerly belonging to John Fossaker& Elizabeth, his wife, and sold by them unto Samson Darrell. . . . And by the said John Battaile given and bequeathed unto Elizabeth, his daughter, now. Wife of the said Andrew Harrison, party to these presents...“
DEED, MADE by ANDREW HARRISON AND HIS WIFE ELIZABETH BATTAILE, WHO WAS THE DAUGHTER OF JOHN BATTAILE. . . TO JOHN JONES.
STATE OF VIRGINIA *
County of Richmond
Deed Book No. 5, page 278.
THIS INDENTURE made~ the second day of January in the eighth year of our Sovereign Lady Anne, by the Grace of God, of Great Britain, France and Ireland, Queen Defender of the faith, etc., and in l3ie sear of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and ten, between Andrew Harrison, the younger, of the parish of St. Mary, in the County of Essex, within the Dominion of Virginia, planter, and Elizabeth, his wife, of the one part, and John Jones, the younger, of the parish of St. Mary in the County of Richmond within the Dominion of Virginia, aforesaid planter, of the second part. Witness that they the said Andrew Harrison and Elizabeth his said Wife as well, for and in consideration of the sum of five thousand pounds of good tobacco, and cash to them in hand, paid by the said John Jones, at and before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof and of every part thereof the said Andrew Harrison and Elizabeth his said wife do hereby confess and acknowledge themselves fully contented,., satisfied, and paid and thereof do acquit exonerate and forever discharge the said John Jones, his heirs executors and administrators and every of them by these presents . . . Have given, granted, bargained sold alyened enfeoffed and confirmed, and by these presents do fully, freely & clearly give, grant, bargain, sell, alyen enfeoffe and absolutely confirme unto the said John Jones and his heirs forever the aforesaid John Jones being in the actual and sole possession of all to
singular the premises by the delivery of Turfe and Twig, in and upon the same, the day, month and year, above mentioned for and in the name of all the land and appurtenances which is and are comprised and
contained in this deed, all that messuage tenement arid tract of Land containing by estimation in the whole, one hundred and fifty acres, scituate lying and being in ye Pish of St. Mary in the said County of Richmond, being part of a dividend of land formerly belonging to John Fossaker & Elizabeth his wife and sold by them unto Samson Darell of Glocester County, as may appear by deed of sale dated, the sixteenth day of April, one thousand six hundred ninety and two, and by the said Samson Darell sold unto John Battaile as appears by assignment thereof made on the back of the said deed bearing date, the seven and twentieth day of September, in the year of our Lord, one thousand six hundred ninety and nine. And by the said John Battaile given and bequeathed unto Elizabeth his Daughter, now Wife of the said Andrew Harris9n, party to these presents which said one hundred and fifty acres of land being moyety or half part of three hundred acres which is now bought and purchased by and between the said John Jones, party to these presents, and his brother George Jones, of and from the said Andrew Harrison and Elizabeth his said wife which said three hundred acres begineth as followeth:
IN WITNESS whereof the parties above-named have to these presents set their hands and seals the day month and year first mentioned—
Andrew Harrison (Seal)
sign ‘~
‘ Elizabeth X Harrison (Seal)
Sealed and delivered ~ —~
in the prence of—~
John Davis
John Dalton
E. Turbervile[12]
Jan 2, 1710
A deed, made January 2, 1710, by Andrew2 Harrison and his wife Elizabeth Battaile, shows that she is the Elizabeth Battaile for whom he was guardian, and who later became his wife.[13]
"Andrew Harrison (son of Andrew Harrison who died in 1718) on August 10, 1708, gave bond in Essex County Court as the guardian of Elizabeth Battaile, and on January 2, 1710, Andrew Harrison and Elizabeth, his wife, deeded land which was bequeathed by the said Elizabeth's father, John Battaile. By which we know that the wife of Andrew Harrison, Jr. was Elizabeth Battaile, daughter of Capt. John Battaile, of Essex County, Virginia, who was Captain of Rangers against the Indians in 1692 and in the same year a member of the House of Burgesses from Essex County..."
Notes provided by Carrie Hoffert:
Wednesday January 2, 1754
George Washington, returning from a long and dangerous trip to the French Fort Le Boeuf, at Venango Creek, arrives back at Christopher Gist's plantation which is near present day Dunbar PA. His mission had been to deliver a message to the French asking them to remove their forces from the Ohio Territory. The French declined the request. [14]
January 2, 1754: We arrived at Mr. Gist‘s, at Monongahela, the 2d of January,(January 2) where I bought a horse and saddle. The 6th, we met seventeen horses, loaded with materials and stores for a fort at the fork of the Ohio, and the day after, some families going out to settle. This day, we arrived at Will‘s Creek…[15]
January 2 1777
Colonel Donop with the Hessian grenadiers, the Jägers and light infantry were at Maidenhead. At noon Lord Cornwallis arrived with the whole army. In the evening the army set out towards Trenton.[16]
Colonel Edward Hand[17]
January 2, 1777
The next battle of that campaign came on January 2, when Lord Cornwallis, one of Howe’s generals, confronted Washington on Assunpink Creek near Trenton as night fell. The American position was precarious, but Washington had a few men keep the American campfires blazing during the night, while the patriot Army circled the enemy camp, attacked and defeated a British force at Princeton, and then retired before Cornwallis could bring his main army to the rescue. The American Army then went into winter quarters at Morristown[18], in a region protected by natural defenses of rocky hills. It was a location that threatened the enemy supply line if the British attempted any move toward Philadelphia…[19]
January 2, 1777
Richard Henry Lee to John Page
Dear Sir, Baltimore, 2d January, 1776 [i.e. 1777]
By the express lately sent from hence, I enclosed you both the printed accounts that we have had of the General's success against the enemy in New Jersey. Colonel Baylor, who brought us the General's letter, says that a party of Hessians more was brought in just as he came away, which makes the number of prisoners between one thousand and eleven hundred. Re-enforcements are daily going up, and in such numbers that the General intends to push the enemy, and we hope successfully, out of the Jerseys. The Hessian officers in general behaved infamously in this battle; and the British light-horse, with the Tories that were in town, scampered off at the beginning of the engagement. A few days before this attack, a flag was sent over to Trenton to this Colonel Rohl, now a prisoner: he received and treated the officer kindly; asked him if 'twas not reported that the Hessians plundered much, and that they were the only plunderers. The officer answering in the affirmative, Colonel Rohl replied that the English had address enough to have it so believed, but that it was notorious that the British officers and soldiers plundered more than the Hessians. Two British officers present denied it not. Soon after this rout, two thousand Hessians that were at Bordentown, below Trenton, on Delaware, marched off, having previously sent away one hundred wagons loaded with plunder, directly towards New York. If the Hessians are the smallest plunderers, what are the British? In truth, we hear that the people are enraged to a great degree at the brutal treatment they have met with.[20]
January 2, 1777
Thomas Nelson to Thomas Jefferson
Dear Jefferson Baltimore Jany 2d 1777 Colo. Zane delivered your Letters to me in this Town, and as I had it not in my power to execute what you desir'd, I gave them to him and desir'd he would negotiate the Bill and transact the other business, which he promis'd to do.
Our affairs have had a black appearance for the two last months, but they say the Devil is not so black as he is painted. We have at last turn'd the Tables upon those Scoundrels by surprize, as you will see by the enclos'd paper. It was very unfortunate for us, that Ewing and Cadwalader could not get over the River, for it is almost certain, that they would have surprized a large Detachment of Hessians at Mount Holly, and most probably they would have taken the greatest part of them. The Number of prisoners exceeds what the General makes them by 500. He is always very moderate. Could we but get a good Regular Army we should soon clear the Continent of these damn'd Invaders. They play the very Devil with the Girls and even old Women to satisfy their libidinus appetities. There is Scarcely a Virgin to be found in the part of the Country that they have pass'd thro' and yet the Jersies will not turn out. Rapes, Rapine, and Murder are not sufficient to rouse the resentment of these People. If they be not sufficient provocations I dispair of any thing working them up to opposition.[21]
January 2, 1782: The Tolerance Edict (Toleranzpatent) guaranteeing existing rights and obligation of the Jewish population, was enacted by Joseph II of Austria, the son of Maria Theresa. Joseph II was influenced by Wilhelm von Dohn, a friend of Mendelssohn's and beginning with this edict, followed a generally enlightened attitude toward the Jews. The Edict (with the final edict less liberal then the original), received mixed reviews by Jewish leaders including Ezekiel Landau and Moss Mendelssohn. They realized that the real intention of the edict was not the emancipation of the Jews but their assimilation. As further proof the new freedoms being granted to the Jews of Austria, Emperor Joseph II "permitted Jewish wholesale merchants, notables and their sons to wear swords" and "insisted that Christians should behave in a friendly matter towards Jews."[22]
January 2, 1781: LOUISVILLE April 22d 1784.— Board of Commissioners met agreable to Act of Assembly,
intitled “An Act for Surveying & apportioning the Lands granted to the Illinois Regiment, & establishing a Town within the said Grant”
Present, Gen’ George R. Clark, John Montgomery Abraham Chap. line, John Bailey William Clark & Walker Daniel Geni Commissioners.
Ordered that Public notice be given by advertising at the different Court Houses in the District, That the Claimants of the Illinois Regiment bring in their Claims and lay them before the next Board, and that Robert Todd Gent be appointed to receive those for Fayette, Walker Daniel for Lincoln & Col~ Campbell, Col~ Montgomery, & Capt Bailey or either of them for Jefferson; to whom the Claimants are desired to give in their respective Claims, & the Deputies are reQuested to advertise their appointments & Office, and make report to the next meeting.
Ordered that a Board meet on the first Monday in August
next or sooner if it shall be judged necessary by a Majority of the Commissioners, & if it shall be so adjudged, a meeting shall be advertised by the Senior Commissioner Present — Ordered that William Clark be appointed Principal Surveyor,
& be intitled to the same Fees as are by Law given to the Surveyors of the Continental & State lines, deducting however the sixth that is there paid to the College. The said Surveyor is hereby directed to proceed forthwith to run the inclusive lines, & to employ one or more Hunters to explore the Country before him & to find the Men in provisions &c. The Surveyor is directed to Survey the Lands on the Northwest Side of the Ohio opposite to the Falls, running up the River & back for Quantity, so as to take in the best Land that the Conditions of the Grant will admit of.
WALKER DANIEL
GEO. R CLARK
JOHN MONTGOMERY
Signed
JOHN BAILEYS
ABRAHAM CHAPLINE
W. CLARK
Copy of the proceedings of the Commrs for adjusting the claims of the Officers & Soldiers of the Illinois Regiment to the Lands given them under a resolution of January 2, 1781 agreable to Act of Assembly passed October Session 1783.
January 2, 1782 Edict of Tolerance
Description: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cb/Toleranzpatent_001.jpg
Description: http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.19/common/images/magnify-clip.png
The Edict of Tolerance of 1781
The 1782 Edict of Tolerance was a religious reform of Joseph II during the time he was emperor of the Habsburg Monarchy as part of his policy of Josephinism, a series of drastic reforms to remodel Austria in the form of the ideal Enlightened state. Joseph II's enlightened despotism included the Patent of Toleration, enacted in 1781, and the Edict of Tolerance in 1782.[1] The Patent of Toleration granted religious freedom to the Lutherans, Calvinists, and Greek Orthodox,[2] but it wasn't until the 1782 Edict of Tolerance that Joseph II extended religious freedom to the Jewish population.
Austria has had a long history on the subject of religious tolerance. This can be traced back to the 16th century when Martin Luther’s writings first appeared in the Habsburg monarchy in Austria. The appearance of Luther’s writings was threatening since they encouraged religious dissent of the Catholic faith, and its ecclesiastical system.[3] Joseph II was also inspired by economic motives,[4] as the emigration of the Protestant population out of Austria would have eventually lead up to an economic slump.
.jpg)
Description: http://bits.wikimedia.org/skins-1.19/common/images/magnify-clip.png
Tolerance church in Vysoká (Bohemia) - without entrance from the street and without tower
1781 Patent of Toleration
Main article: Patent of Toleration
The 1781 Patent of Toleration allowed certain rights and recognized the existence of non-Catholic religions in Austria. The Edict of Toleration allowed Protestants from other countries where religious tolerance was not enforced to immigrate to Austria and hold jobs such as pharmacists, carpenters and blacksmiths.[5] The tolerated religions, however, were allowed to have congregations no larger than 100 people in a private home. If a certain sect had more than 100 families living in an area, they were allowed to build a church only if the church did not have a direct entrance from the street and had no visible appearance of being a church. When it came to the case of mixed marriages, there were also laws that had to be followed: if a Catholic man had children with a non-Catholic woman, all the children would be raised Catholic. In the case of a Catholic woman with a non-Catholic man, the girls would be raised Catholic while the boys would be raised non-Catholic.[2]
Scrutiny from Catholic officials occurred in places, like Bohemia, where the officials attempted to preserve religious unity. In order to do this they had printed out all the pamphlets that described this edict in German. The population whom this would affect, however, generally couldn't speak or read German.[6]
[edit] Jewish community before the Edict
Long before the Jews had been granted religious freedom by Joseph II, they were treated rather harshly by his mother, Maria Theresa and had been ostracized by others. During the Middle Ages, Austrian Jews had lived apart from the Orthodox communities and had not been allowed by the government to own immovable property. Although this was not the case for the more affluent Jews, those who were wealthy and were able to establish factories were recipients of preferential treatment by Maria Theresa, but otherwise there were restrictions on the rest of the Jewish population. Joseph II was the first one who made an attempt to eliminate these attitudes and sanctions that were toward the majority of the Jewish population.[citation needed]
[edit] 1782 Edict of Tolerance
The 1782 Edict of Tolerance was issued on January 2, 1782. The Edict was initially put into effect in lower Austria. The prologue to the resolution stated “This policy paper aims at making the Jewish population useful to the state."[7] This second edict allowed Jewish children to attend schools and universities. It allowed adults to engage in jobs such as being merchants or to open factories. It also eliminated previous restrictions, which had forced the Jews to wear gold stars or to pay a tax that was only levied on the Jews and cattle.[8] According to the edict, however, the Jewish languages, the written language Hebrew and the spoken language Yiddish, were to be replaced by the national language of the country. Official documents and school textbooks could not be printed in Hebrew.[9][23][24]
Haskalah in Germany
The giant protagonist of the Haskalah in Germany was without doubt Moses Mendelsohn, Mendelsohn was so central and important in the Jewish Haskalah precisely because he was also accepted as a German philosopher of the Enlightenment and served as a model for enlightened thinking as promoted by Gotthold Lessing in his "Nathan the Wise." By succeeding in German society, Mendelsohn seemed to prove that the model "worked" - that it was possible to be BOTH a Jew and a modern German enlightenment philosopher and nationalist. The German Haskalah movement was the first such movement and provided the model and inspiration for those that would come after.
European Society, Politics and Haskalah
The Haskalah was stimulated by several related trends and events in Europe. The first was the philosophical and social Enlightenment movement, which was centered on the deistic and skeptical philosophy of the encyclopedists and the attack on religion. The second was the rise of the centralized nationalist secular state, which led on the one hand to political emancipation of the Jews in some countries, but at the same time, on the other hand, to programs of more or less forced assimilation through education.
The history of the Edict of Tolerance (Toleranzpatent) of the Holy Roman (Hapsburg) Emperor Joseph II illustrates the dual nature of "emancipation" of the Jews as it was promulgated in much of Europe. The original edict of 1781 extended religious freedom to all Christian sects, but not to Jews. In 1782, the edict was extended to include Jews, on certain very restrictive conditions. Though Jews would now be allowed to live in Vienna and Austria, and to engage in various crafts that were previously forbidden to Jews under the odious rule of Maria Theresa, they were forced to study in non-Jewish studies and to found schools for that purpose or to study in general schools. Jewish schools had to be under government supervision. Even these laws found only a reluctant acceptance in the various states of the empire, because various guilds protested against competition from Jews. This policy, which amounted in some cases to compulsory cultural genocide, was replicated in subsequent decrees of various German states, in Eastern Europe and in the Russian Tsarist regime in the 19th century.
The French Revolution provided an additional impetus to the Haskalah movement. The progress of Napoleon spread the doctrines of enlightenment throughout Europe, and the emancipation of the Jews provided the basis for Jewish integration into European societies. Once again however, it was integration as individuals and not as a group or ethnic entity that was granted to Jews, even if they were allowed their individual liberty of conscience and culture.
What the Haskalah Negated
The Haskalah, in addition to negating ghetto dress and mannerisms, negated the Talmud, Yiddish and Messianism, all central characteristics of Jewish communal life in the European Middle Ages though not necessarily essential parts of Judaism. As such, it evoked a lot of resistance from those for whom these were important causes. Zionism was later to adopt all of these positions, and to inherit the same enmity from advocates of Talmudic and Messianic Judaism as well as "Yiddishists."
Haskalah and the Talmud
The Talmud had been the cornerstone of Jewish life and education for over a thousand years. The identification of the Talmud with Judaism and its centrality to Judaism were sealed by the persistent persecution of the Jews by Christian authorities in Europe, based on absurd notions that the purpose of the Talmud was to conceal slanders against the Christian religion and plots against Christian rule (see Jew Hate for a brief summary). Talmudic law and Talmudic studies and glosses on the Talmud had virtually monopolized Jewish education and philosophy, to the exclusion of all other studies including the Hebrew language and the Bible itself. The Torah, the five books of Moses, could only be approached through the Talmud. To prevent "Hellenization" edicts were passed forbidding the study of secular philosophy and any other secular learning. Talmud study became the bulwark of Jewish religious reaction, as well as an object of suspicion in the new "enlightenment" legislation.
The leaders of the German Haskalah, Moses Mendelsohn and Naphtali Herz Wessely, the pioneer of Haskalah education, did not openly challenge the sanctity and the authority of the Oral Law. However, they tried to demote the study of Talmud from its supreme position in Jewish education. There was no alternative for those who wanted introduce additional studies, because the Talmudists claimed and enforced a monopoly. Mendelssohn, wrote to Naphtali Herz Homberg, a leader of the enlightenment in Galicia, stressing the importance of deeds and the study of the Bible for Judaism, without mentioning the Talmud. Wessely stated: "We were not all created to become talmudists." David Friedlaender, another Haskalah leader, rejoiced at the decline of Yeshivot. [25]
January 2, 1788: January 2, 1788
Georgia becomes the fourth state to ratify the Constitution.[26]
Delaware, on December 7, 1787, became the first State to ratify the new Constitution, with its vote being unanimous. Pennsylvania ratified on December 12, 1787, by a vote of 46 to 23 (66.67%). New Jersey ratified on December 19, 1787, and Georgia on January 2, 1788, both with unanimous votes. The requirement of ratification by nine states, set by Article Seven of the Constitution, was met when New Hampshire voted to ratify, on June 21, 1788.
In New York, fully two thirds of the convention delegates were at first opposed to the Constitution. Hamilton led the Federalist campaign, which included the fast-paced appearance of the Federalist Papers in New York newspapers. An attempt to attach conditions to ratification almost succeeded, but on July 26, 1788, New York ratified, with a recommendation that a bill of rights be appended. The vote was close – yeas 30 (52.6%), nays 27 – due largely to Hamilton's forensic abilities and his reaching a few key compromises with moderate anti-Federalists led by Melancton Smith.[a] The Continental Congress – which still functioned at irregular intervals – passed a resolution on September 13, 1788, to put the new Constitution into operation. [27]
On January 2, 1813, General Harrison issued a general order commending several officers including Ensign Harrison of the 19th Infantry.
General Winchester did not fare so well in the North. He was defeated by British and Indians under General Henry Proctor at the river Raisin near present day Monroe, Michigan. After this defeat, Proctor permitted the Indians to massacre their captives. William Henry Harrison was then promoted to Major General and appointed Commander-In-Chief of the Army in the Northwest.
His first moved was to establish a stronghold in Northwestern Ohio. The location was the South Bank of the Maumee River near present day Toledo. It was well positioned, strongly built, and of very large size. This was Fort Meigs, named for Ohio Governor Jonathan Meigs. The fort was built in the Winter of 1813 and during the Winter and Spring, troops, supplies and cannon poured in. [28]
Sat. January 2, 1864:
Helped borrows butcher. A very cold day[29]
January 2, 1870: Joseph Abel Warren (b. January 2, 1870 in GA / d, August 13, 1933)[30]
January 2, 1879: Mabel Cynthia Heald b January 2, 1879 at Rochester, Ia. [31]
January 2, 1901: On this date in 1901, U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt received his 1st degree in Matinecock Lodge #806, Oyster Bay, New York.[32]
January 2, 1945: The Chicago Commission for the Encouragement of Local Art was created by the Chicago City Council in 1914 at Carter Henry Harrison's behest. Its purpose was to support local artists by purchasing some of their paintings and sculptures, and then displaying these works in the public schools, city hall, and other municipal buildings of Chicago. The Commission had seven members, three of whom were selected by the Art Institute of Chicago, one by the Mayor of Chicago, and one each by the Municipal Art League, the Friends of American Art, and the Palette and Chisel Club. Harrison was appointed to the Commission in 1924 by Mayor William Dever, and served through the end of 1944. This series contains items relating to the Commission, including yearbooks from 1915 and 1925, a list of the works purchased by the Commission from 1914 through 1943, and a letter to the Committee on Finance of the Chicago City Council dated January 2, 1945, in which Harrison recounts some of the history of the Commission in connection with his resignation over the fact that many of the paintings purchased by the Commission were being hung in the offices of the Board of Education rather than the public schools as Harrison had intended. [33]
January 2, 1963 At ApBac, fifty miles from Saigon, when a considerable force of
Diem’s regulars encircle a Viet Cong battalion one-tenth its size, they decline to close with them
and finally permit the Viet Cong to escape in the night after they knock down five American
helicopters and kill three American Advisors.
David Ferrie calls the office of G. Wray Gill today. [34]
January 2, 1965: Lila Jane Hamilton b August 3, 1920 at Sioux City, Ia. md September 5, 1950 Richard Howland Finne b November 21, 1924 at Onawa, Ia. d January 2, 1965 at Torrance, Calif. Lila Jane and Richard Finne had two sons:
1. John Howland Finne b January 16, 1957 at Inglewood, Calif, and
2. Richard Frost Finne b April 19, 1959 at Torrance, Calif.
January 2, 1997: Michael F. Hammer, Karl L. Skorecki, Sara Selig, Shraga Blazer, Bruce Rappaport, Robert Bradman, Neil Bradman, P. J. Warburton, Monica Ismajlowicz. "Y Chromosomes of Jewish Priests." Nature 385(6611) (January 2, 1997): 32-33. Excerpts:
"Based on surveys of Jewish cemetery gravestones, priests represent approximately 5% of the estimated total male world Jewish population of roughly 7 million.... We identified six haplotypes, whose frequencies are shown in the table (YAP+ DYS19A-E and YAP+ DYS19, all alleles.) Applying the x2 test to the frequencies of the T-chromosome haplotypes distinguishes priests from the lay population. The most striking difference was in the frequency of YAP+ chromosomes among compares to lay Jews. Only 1.5% of Y-chromosomes among priests were YAP+, in comparison to a frequency of 18.4% in lay Jews. In contrast, we found no significant difference in the distribution of alleles for the non-Y-chromosomes locus polymorphism D1S191. (data not shown). These Y-chromosome haplotype differences confirm a distinct paternal genealogy for Jewish priests... This result is consistent with an origin for the Jewish priesthood antedating the division of world Jewry into Ashkenazi and Sephardic communities, and is of particular interest in view of the pronounced genetic diversity displayed between the two [Sephardic and Ashkenazic] communities."
Regarding the "Cohen gene": David Goldstein, an evolutionary geneticist at Oxford University, said: "It looks like this chromosomal type was a constituent of the ancestral Hebrew population. It was incredibly exciting to find something that could be tracing paternally-inherited traits over to 50 generations, three or four thousand years of history."
Only about half, or less (40-45%), of Ashkenazi Jewish Cohens have the so-called "Kohen gene". A somewhat greater percentage of Sephardic Cohens have the gene. But it doesn't approach 100 percent. Tell that to the staff of Karl Skorecki's institution, Technion University, who claim here "Professor Karl Skorecki discovered genetic proof that all Jews belonging to the Cohen family are descendents of the biblical high priest Aaron Hacohen." If that's not misrepresentation I don't know what is. [Dr. Skorecki himself does not approve of the university's use of the word "all" and has asked them to fix their description of his research.]
Daniel Friedman observes: "Ashkenazi and Sephardic Cohanim (left two columns in the chart below) show significant differences in the occurrence frequencies of the haplotypes said to make up the 'Cohen gene'. Israelite populations from both populations (right two columns) do not show the same differences. If the 'Cohen gene' comes from a single Biblical ancestor, the Cohanim seem to have had different genetic histories since the split between Sepharad and Ashkenaz."
The COHEN Gene: YAP+ DYS19 Haplotypes
"Careful examination of their [Skorecki's and Thomas's] works reveals many faults that lead to the inevitable conclusion that their claim [that most Cohenim share a common origin] has not been proven. The faults are: the definition of the studied communities, significant differences between three samples of Jewish priests, failure to use enough suitable markers to construct the Unique-Event-polymorphisms haplotypes, problematic method of calculating coalescence time and underestimating the mutation rate of Y chromosome microsatellites. The suggestion that the 'Cohen modal haplotype' is a signature haplotype for the ancient Hebrew population is also not supported by data from other populations." (p. 156)
Zoossmann claims that the studies of Jewish priests are rather problematic. They merge together the Sephardim even though they are diverse, and he claims this is unscientific. He also argues that some useful markers were not used in the studies. The SRY4064, SRY 465, Tat, and sY81 polymorphisms were useless for the purposes of the studies, he writes. Also, the Cohen modal haplotype is the most common haplotype among Southern Italians and Central Italians [A. Caglià et al., "Increased forensic efficiency of a STR-based Y-specific haplotype by addition of the highly polymorphic DYS385 locus." International Journal of Legal Medicine 111 (1998): 142-146], Iraqi Kurds [C. Brinkmann et al., "Human Y-chromosomal STR haplotypes in a Kurdish population sample." International Journal of Legal Medicine 112 (1999): 181-183], and Hungarians [S. Füredi et al., "Y-STR haplotyping in two Hungarian populations." International Journal of Legal Medicine 113:1 (1999): 38-42] Some Greeks and Armenians also have the Cohen modal haplotype. Since the haplotype is found among many populations in the eastern Mediterranean, Zoossmann demonstrated that it does not represent (exclusively) an ancient Israelite trait.
Dr. Skorecki made contact with Professor Michael Hammer, of the University of Arizona, a leading researcher in molecular genetics and a pioneer in Y chromosome research. Professor Hammer uses DNA analysis to study the history of populations, their origins and migrations. His previous research included work on the origins of the Native American Indians and the development of the Japanese people.
A study was undertaken to test the hypothesis. If there were a common ancestor, the Cohanim should have common genetic markers at a higher frequency than the general Jewish population.
In the first study, as reported in the prestigious British science journal, Nature (January 2, 1997), 188 Jewish males were asked to contribute some cheek cells from which their DNA was extracted for study. Participants from Israel, England and North America were asked to identify whether they were a Cohen, Levi or Israelite, and to identify their family background.
The results of the analysis of the Y chromosome markers of the Cohanim and non-Cohanim were indeed significant. A particular marker, (YAP-) was detected in 98.5 percent of the Cohanim, and in a significantly lower percentage of non-Cohanim.
FURTHER CONFIRMATION
In a second study, Dr. Skorecki and associates gathered more DNA samples and expanded their selection of Y chromosome markers. Solidifying their hypothesis of the Cohens' common ancestor, they found that a particular array of six chromosomal markers was found in 97 of the 106 Cohens tested. This collection of markers has come to be known as the Cohen Modal Hapoltype (CMH) -- the standard genetic signature of the Jewish priestly family. The chances of these findings happening at random is greater than one in 10,000.
The finding of a common set of genetic markers in both Ashkenazi and Sephardi Cohanim worldwide clearly indicates an origin pre-dating the separate development of the two communities around 1000 CE. Date calculation based on the variation of the mutations among Cohanim today yields a time frame of 106 generations from the ancestral founder of the line, some 3,300 years -- the approximate time of the Exodus from Egypt, the lifetime of Aaron HaCohen.
Date calculations based on the mutations yield a time frame for the Cohen line of some 3,300 years!
Professor Hammer was recently in Israel for the Jewish Genome Conference. He confirmed that his findings are consistent -- over 80 percent of self-identified Cohanim have a common set of markers.
The finding that less than one-third of the non-Cohen Jews who were tested possess these markers is not surprising to the geneticists. Jewishness is not defined genetically. Other Y-chromosomes can enter the Jewish gene pool through conversion or through a non-Jewish father. Jewish status is determined by the mother. Tribe membership follows the father's line.
AMAZING STATISTICS
Calculations based on the high rate of genetic similarity of today's Cohanim resulted in the highest "paternity-certainty" rate ever recorded in population genetics studies -- a scientific testimony to family faithfulness.
Stated Dr. David Goldstein of Oxford University:
"For more than 90 percent of the Cohens to share the same genetic markers after such a period of time is a testament to the devotion of the wives of the Cohens over the years. Even a low rate of infidelity would have dramatically lowered the percentage."
ASTONISHING RESULTS
In the first study, as reported in the prestigious British science journal, "Nature" (January 2, 1997), 188 Jewish males were asked to contribute some cheek cells from which their DNA was extracted for study. Participants from Israel, England and North America were asked to specify whether they were a Cohen, Levi or Israelite, and to identify their family background.
The results of the analysis of the Y chromosome markers of the Cohanim and non-Cohanim were indeed significant. A particular marker (YAP-), was detected in 98.5 percent of the Cohanim, and in a significantly lower percentage of non-Cohanim.
In a second study, Dr. Skorecki and associates gathered more DNA samples and expanded their selection of Y chromosome markers. Solidifying their hypothesis of the common ancestor of Cohanim, they found that a particular array of six chromosomal markers were found in 97 of the 106 Cohanim tested. This collection of markers has come to be known as the Cohen Modal Haplotype (CMH) -- the standard genetic signature of the Jewish priestly family. The chances of these findings happening at random is greater than one in 10,000.
The finding of a common set of genetic markers in both Ashkenazic and Sephardic Cohanim worldwide clearly indicates an origin pre-dating the separate development of the two communities around 1000 CE. Date calculation based on the variation of the mutations among Cohanim today yields a time frame of 106 generations from the ancestral founder of the line, some 3,300 years, the approximate time of the exodus from Egypt, the lifetime of Aaron the Cohen.
http://www.innernet.org.il/../sitegraf/barcolor.gif
TRIBAL DESCENT
Professor Hammer was recently in Israel for the Jewish Genome Conference. He confirmed that his findings are consistent: over 80 percent of self-identified Cohanim have a common set of markers. The finding that less than one-third of the non-Cohen Jews who were tested possess these markers is not surprising to the geneticists. "Jewishness" is not defined genetically. Other Y chromosomes can enter the Jewish gene pool through conversion or through a non-Jewish father. Jewish status is determined by the mother. Tribe membership follows the father's family line.
Calculations based on the high rate of genetic similarity of today's Cohanim resulted in the highest "paternity-certainty" rate ever recorded in population genetics studies -- a scientific testimony to family faithfulness.
Wider genetic studies of diverse present-day Jewish communities show a remarkable genetic cohesiveness. Jews from Iran, Iraq, Yemen, North Africa and European Ashkenazim all cluster together with other Semitic groups, with their origin in the Middle East. A common geographical origin can be seen for all mainstream Jewish groups studied.
This genetic research has clearly refuted the once-current libel that Ashkenazic Jews are not related to the ancient Hebrews, but are descendants of the Kuzar tribe -- a pre-10th century Turko-Asian empire which reportedly converted en masse to Judaism. Researchers compared the DNA signature of the Ashkenazic Jews against those of Turkish-derived people, and found no correspondence. [35]
Micheal Cecere, author of “They behaved like soldiers” gives a talk at Trenton, January 2, 2005. Gary Goodlove received a signed copy.
December 26, 1922 – January 2, 2007
Winton D. Goodlove
Birth:
December 26, 1922
Death:
January 2, 2007
http://www.findagrave.com/icons2/trans.gif
h/o Berniece E.
Family links:
Spouse:
Berniece E. Goodlove (1923 - 1999)
Burial:
Jordans Grove Cemetery
Central City
Linn County
Iowa, USA
Created by: Gail Wenhardt
Record added: Apr 04, 2011
Find A Grave Memorial# 67902190
Winton D. Goodlove
Added by: Gail Wenhardt
Winton D. Goodlove
Cemetery Photo
Added by: Jackie L. Wolfe
[36]
Jacqulin, Jeff, and Jillian Goodlove visit the Oriental Institute Museum, January 2, 2011.
100_2267[38]
January 2, 2011 at Greek Islands in Chicago after a visit to the Oriental Museum at the University of Chicago.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/69
[2] http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/366
[3] http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/533
[4] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[5] http://www.levity.com/alchemy/islam16.html
[6] mike@abcomputers.com
[7] mike@abcomputers.com
[8] http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/1235
[9] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isabella_I_of_Castile
[10] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[11] Abraham’s Children, Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People, page 178.
[12] Torrence and Allied Families, Robert M. Torrence pgs 307-308
[13] . [Robert Torrence, Torrence and Allied Families (Philadelphia: Wickersham Press, 1938), 307; State of Virginia, County of Richmond, Deed Book No. 5, page 278] A Chronological Listing of Events In the Lives of Andrew Harrison, Sr. of Essex County, Virginia, Andrew Harrison, Jr. of Essex and Orange Counties, Virginia, Lawrence Harrison, Sr. of Virginia and Pennsylvania Compiled from Secondary Sources Covering the time period of 1640 through 1772 by Daniel Robert Harrison, Milford, Ohio, November, 1998.
[14] http://www.nps.gov/archive/fone/1754.htm
[15] In Search of Turkey Foot Road, page 90-91.
[16] http://members.tripod.com/~Silvie/Schilling.html
[17] A nineteenth century engraving. Elected by backcountry riflemen as their leader, this very able officer served with distinction through the New York and New Jersey campaigns. In the second battle of Trenton he took command on the Maidenhead Road when his superior officer, General Fermoy, a French volunteer, fled as the British approached. Henry P. Johnson, The Campaign of 1776 around New York and Brooklyn (1878). Washington’s Crossing, by David Hackett Fischer.
[18] Col. William Crawford is listed as having served in the 5th Virginia Regiment, Feb. 13, 1776 and the 7th later that year. His campaigns include Trenton and Princeton. They surprised the Hessians at Trenton, Captured at least one thousand prisoners and killed their commander. The Americans escaped back to their camp with very few losses.
Washington moved his army in darkness; swiftly through the rural areas, falling upon the enemy troops near Princeton, taking more than 200 prisoners. Before Cornwallis could rally his forces, the Americans were safely stationed at Morristown Heights.
(From River Clyde to Tymochtee and Col. William Crawford by Grace U. Emahiser, 1969, page 142)
[19] George Washington, A Biography in His Own Words, Edited by Ralph K. Andrist
[20] Letters of Delegates to Congress: Volume 6 January 1, 1777 - April 30, 1777
[21] Letters of Delegates to Congress: Volume 6 January 1, 1777 - April 30, 1777
[22] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[23] [edit] References
1. ^ Blitz, C. Rudolph. The Religious Reforms of Joseph II (1780-1790) and their Economic Significance.Pg. 583
2. ^ a b Blitz, C. Rudolph. The Religious Reforms of Joseph II (1780-1790) and their Economic Significance.Pg.585
3. ^ O'Brien, H.C. Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society pg.7 Retrieved 02-2008
4. ^ O'Brien, H.C. Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society Retrieved 02-2008
5. ^ Blitz, C. Rudolph. The Religious Reforms of Joseph II (1780-1790) and their Economic Significance.Pg.584
6. ^ O'Brien, H.C. Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society pg.24 Retrieved 02-2008
7. ^ O'Brien, H.C. Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society pg.29 Retrieved 02-2008
8. ^ Ingrao, W. Charles. The Habsburg Monarchy 1618-1815Great Britain:Cambridge University Press, 1994. pg 199
9. ^ O'Brien, H.C. Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II.Transactions of the American Philosophical Society pg.30 Retrieved 02-2008
•"The Religious Reforms of Joseph II (1780-1790) and their Economic Significance". Journal of European Economic History 18: 583–586. 1989.
•Ingrao, Charles W. (1994). The Habsburg Monarchy 1618-1815. Great Britain: Cambridge University Press. p. 199.
•Mendes-Flohr, Paul and Reinharz, Jehuda, ed. The Jew in the Modern World, New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
•O'Brien, Charles H. (1969). "The Ideas of Religious Toleration at the time of Joseph II. A Study of the Enlightenment among Catholics in Austria." (PDF). American Philosophical Society 59 (7): 5–80. JSTOR 1006062.
[24] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1782_Edict_of_Tolerance
[25] http://www.zionism-israel.com/dic/Haskalah.htm
[26] ON This Day in America by John Wagman
1. [27] ^ Christian G. Fritz, American Sovereigns: The People and America's Constitutional Tradition Before the Civil War (Cambridge University Press, 2008) at p. 131 ISBN 978-0-521-88188-3 (noting that "Madison, along with other Americans clearly understood" the Articles of Confederation "to be the first federal Constitution.")
2. ^ a b c d e f Maier 2010, pp. 11-13.
3. ^ Maier 2010, pp. 12-13, 19.
4. ^ Maier 2010, pp. 15-16.
5. ^ Bowen 2010, pp. 129-130.
6. ^ Bowen 2010, p. 31.
7. ^ Maier 2010, p. 13.
8. ^ Wood 1998, pp. 356-367, 359.
9. ^ Maier 2010, pp. 14, 30, 66.
10. ^ Maier, Pauline (2010). Ratification : the people debate the Constitution, 1787–1788. New York: Simon & Schuster. ISBN 9780684868547 p.21.
11. ^ Bowen, Catherine (2010) [First published 1966]. Miracle at Philadelphia : the story of the Constitutional Convention, May to September, 1787. New York: Little, Brown. ISBN 9780316102612. p.11.
12. ^ Morris (1987) pp 298–99.
13. ^ Armstrong, Virginia Irving (1971). I Have Spoken: American History Through the Voices of the Indians. Pocket Books. p. 14. ISBN 671-78555-9. See also, House Concurrent Resolution 331, October 21, 1988. United States Senate. Retrieved 2008-11-23.. In October 1988, the U.S. Congress passed Concurrent Resolution 331 to recognize the influence of the Iroquois Constitution upon the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
14. ^ Greymont, Barbara. The Iroquois in the American Revolution 1972. ISBN 0-8156-0083-6, p.vii.
15. ^ Morgan, Edmund S., Benjamin Franklin 2002. ISBN 0-300-10162-7 (pbk) p.80-81 Viewed December 29, 2011.
16. ^ Mee, Charles L., Jr. The Genius of the People. New York: Harper & Row, 1987. p. 237
17. ^ Greymont, Barbara. Op.cit. p.66 These intrigues were mounted by (a) the French and British empires, (b) the colonies, then states of New York, Pennsylvania and Virginia, and (c) the United States as the Continental Congress, the Articles Congress and subsequently.
18. ^ NARA. "National Archives Article on the Bill of Rights". http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/charters.html. Retrieved 2007-12-16.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/US_Constitution
[28] http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~harrisonrep/harrbios/battealHarr3466VA.htm
[29] William Harrison Goodlove Civil War Diary
[30] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe.
[31] http://cwcfamily.org/egy3.htm
[32] http://www.bessel.org/datemas.htm
[33] http://mms.newberry.org/html/harrison.html
[34] http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v2n1/chrono1.pdf
[35] http://www.innernet.org.il/article.php?aid=95
[36] http://www.findagrave.com/cgi-bin/fg.cgi?page=gr&GSln=Goodlove&GSbyrel=in&GSdyrel=in&GSob=n&GSsr=41&GRid=67902190&
[37] Photo by Sherri Maxson.
[38] Photo by Jeff Goodlove
[39] Photo by the Waiter.
No comments:
Post a Comment