Like us on Facebook!
https://www.facebook.com/ThisDayInGoodloveHistory
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jeff-Goodlove/323484214349385
Join me on http://www.linkedin.com/
Jeff Goodlove email address: Jefferygoodlove@aol.com
Surnames associated with the name Goodlove have been spelled the following different ways; Cutliff, Cutloaf, Cutlofe, Cutloff, Cutlove, Cutlow, Godlib, Godlof, Godlop, Godlove, Goodfriend, Goodlove, Gotleb, Gotlib, Gotlibowicz, Gotlibs, Gotlieb, Gotlob, Gotlobe, Gotloeb, Gotthilf, Gottlieb, Gottliebova, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlow, Gutfrajnd, Gutleben, Gutlove
The Chronology of the Goodlove, Godlove, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlieb (Germany, Russia, Czech etc.), and Allied Families of Battaile, (France), Crawford (Scotland), Harrison (England), Jackson (Ireland), Jefferson, LeClere (France), Lefevre (France), McKinnon (Scotland), Plantagenets (England), Smith (England), Stephenson (England?), Vance (Ireland from Normandy), Washington, Winch (England, traditionally Wales), including correspondence with George Rogers Clark, and including ancestors William Henry Harrison, Andrew Jackson, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Adams, John Quincy Adams and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Martin Van Buren, Teddy Roosevelt, U.S. Grant, Benjamin Harrison “The Signer”, Benjamin Harrison, Jimmy Carter, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, William Taft, John Tyler (10th President), James Polk (11th President)Zachary Taylor, and Abraham Lincoln.
The Goodlove Family History Website:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/g/o/o/Jeffery-Goodlove/index.html
The Goodlove/Godlove/Gottlieb families and their connection to the Cohenim/Surname project:
• New Address! http://wwwfamilytreedna.com/public/goodlove/default.aspx
• • Books written about our unique DNA include:
• “Abraham’s Children, Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People” by Jon Entine.
•
• “ DNA & Tradition, The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews” by Rabbi Yaakov Kleiman, 2004.
“Jacob’s Legacy, A Genetic View of Jewish History” by David B. Goldstein, 2008.
Birthdays on February 5:
Sarah E. Connell (half 3rd cousin 4x removed)
Melvin Godlove
John L.D. LeClere (Grand uncle)
William H.H. Plum (2nd cousin 3x removed)
Nancy J. Sherman Schoebel (3rd cousin)
Joseph Weber
February 5, 1265: Pope Clement IV (Gui Faucoi le Gros) (Guy Foulques the Fat) appointed, Clement IV named Pope to 1268 [1]
February 5, 1428: King Alfonso V, ordered Sicily's Jews to attend conversion sermons.[2]
February 5, 1694: Connell, James 20, 184 Transported from Ireland to Maryland in 1678 (Index of Early Settlers 1633 to 1680 V 1, A to H Annapolis, Maryland Will of Robert Gates, St Marys, County, Maryland Written February 5th, 1694 Probated June 6, 1698 Test: Rich'd Edelen, James Connell Jas. Haggon. 6.113 (Maryland Wills V2. page 140) [3]
February 5, 1754
1754 William and Hannah Crawford (6th great grandfather and grandmother) purchase 64 acres of land from Elijah Teague, (who was moving to some part of Carrolinia)[4] February 5, 1754, formerly part of 300 acres of land owned by Richard Pendals. Deed Book B, page 148, Frederick Co., VA. Proclamation of Governor Robert Dinwiddle for volunteers for the Virginia defene and security.
William Crawford and his brother Valentine Crawford, Jr., enlisted in the service and took the oath to King George Ill. Recorded in the “Old” Court House, Winchester, VA.[5]
February 5, 1762: – Land Grant: Richard Stephenson (husband of the 7th great grandmother) -180 acres. This is believed to be the property that Stephenson owned that adjoined Peter Burr’s Bardane property.[6]
February 5, 1771; The gentlemen all went away. I rid to my mill in the afternoon.[7] George Washington (Grandnephew of the wife of the 1st cousin 10x removed).
(February 5, 1773)
Interestingly McClure wrote later in his diary (February 5, 1773) when He reached Pittsburgh again:Drinking, debauchery & all kinds of vice reign, in this frontier of depravity. [8]
February 5, 1777
But why would Eleanor Howard (step 4th great grandaunt) have used the surname Howard rather than McKinnon when obtaining the marriage license?
On February 5, 1777, the General Assembly of Maryland enacted a law which made it necessary for every male 18 years and older, every civil officer, senator, delegate to congress or assembly, member of council, elector of the senate, attorneys at law, every voter for delegate, sheriff, electors of to the senate, and all other persons holding any office of trust or profit in the state to sign an Oath of Allegiance and Fidelity to the state of Maryland and the cause of freedom before a magistrate of the court. John Dodson (husband of the 4th great grandaunt) signed the Oath on February 5, 1777. However, Daniel McKinnon,(5th great grandfather) being ordained by the Church of England had sworn an oath to the king of England and if he were still in Maryland, probably felt he could not make such an oath. A careful review reveals there is no record of him signing the Oath of Allegiance.
If it is correct that Daniel McKinnon returned to Britain in 1776 or 1777 as a result of the dis-establishment of the Church of England, Eleanor no longer had a home. The law required that she obtain the marriage license in the county where she usually resided and since the family moved frequently, she may have needed proof that she usually resided in Anne Arundel County. What better proof than the Howard surname that had long been associated with Anne Arundel County.
With Daniel McKinnon out of the country, Eleanor could have wanted to set the record straight as to her true father.
Since the illegitimate birth of Eleanor McKinnon was a very scandalous affair at that time, the clerk of the court for Anne Arundel County granting the license was someone who usually had intimate knowledge of the county and he may have known that the true father of Eleanor McKinnon was a Howard. (A review of the original record shows no interlineations or changes in the marriage license entry.)[9]
February 5, 1777: On this day in 1777, Georgia formally adopts a new state constitution and becomes the first U.S. state to abolish the inheritance practices of primogeniture and entail.
Primogeniture ensured that the eldest son in a family inherited the largest portion of his father's property upon the father's death. The practice of entail, guaranteeing that a landed estate remain in the hands of only one male heir, was frequently practiced in conjunction with primogeniture. (Virginia abolished entail in 1776, but permitted primogeniture to persist until 1785.)
Georgians restructured inheritance laws in Article LI of the state's constitution by abolishing entail in all forms and proclaiming that any person who died without a will would have his or her estate divided equally among their children; the widow shall have a child's share, or her dower at her option.
The British colonies in North America, and particularly the southern colonies, were known as a haven for younger sons of the British gentry. Most famously, Benjamin Franklin announced in his autobiography that he was the youngest Son of the youngest Son for 5 Generations back. Moving to the colonies was an attractive option for younger sons like Franklin because there younger sons could take their monetary inheritance and build up their own estates, whereas primogeniture and entail prevented them from inheriting similar estates in the mother country.[10]
February 5, 1778 Headqtrs., Ft. Pitt February 5th, 1778
Dr Sir
As I am credibly informed that the English have lodged a quantity of arms, ammunition, provision & clothing at a small Indian town about 100 miles from Fort Pitt, to support the savages in their excursions against the inhabitants of this and adjacent counties, I ardently wish to collect as many brave active lads as are willing to turn out, to destroy this magazine. Every man must be provided with a horse, & every article necessary to equip them for the expedition, except ammuntion, which, with some arms, I can furnish.
It may not be unnecessary to assure them, that everything they are able to bring away shall be sold at public venue for the sole benefit of the captors, & the money equally distributed, tho’ I am certain that a sense of the service they will render to their country will operate more strongly than the expectation of gain. I therefore expect you will use your influence on this occasion, & bring all the volunteers you can raise to Fort Pitt by the 15th of this month.
I am, dear Sir, Obdt humble Servt. Edwd Hand Col. Wm. Crawford.
N.B. The horses shall be appraised, & paid for if lost.
…The army was more interested in the warriors they thought were hidden in the other wegiwas and cabins of the village, and they poured a hot, prolonged fire into them, which gradually dwindled away as they realized they were shooting at structures in which there were no men. Then Michikapeche, the wife of Pimoacan, emerged from a cabin and tried to flee amidst a hail of bullets. A rifle ball clipped off the tip of one of her fingers, and she was overtaken and on the verge of being tomahawked and scalped when Maj. William Crawford intervened and ordered that she be taken prisoner.317 The village was then ransacked, but only a small amount of plunder was found and taken.
Another detachment of this brave army struck a second Delaware town up the Mahoning. It, too, was empty except for five squaws. One was taken prisoner. Nearby a young Indian boy hunting birds with his bow was spotted. He was shot and killed. Then the army set off for home.
Today they arrived at Fort Pitt, and there was little exultation over their accomplishments. Even before the day was over, the abortive expedition was being called by the derisive name it would always retain—the Squaw Campaign.[11]
[Recollections of Samuel Murphy. 3S28-32.J
General Hand’s expedition. This was in the winter 1777-78 with a slight fall of fresh snow. About 400 men [went out]. Col. Providence Mounts, of Mounts Creek,[12] which empties in Youghiogheny, was out. Col. William Crawford, Major Brenton, Capt. John Stephenson,(half 6th great granduncle) Captain Scott,[13] etc. William Brady, a blacksmith of Pittsburgh, was chosen pilot.[14] Simon Girty was out, and wanted the appointment.
On the way out, Major Brenton lost his horse, and he got Simon Girty to remain with him, they found the horse, and rejoined the army just at the close of the fight, or rather firing, on the Indian town, in the forks of Neshaneck and Shenango and on the eastern bank of the latter.[15] Orders had been given as they approached the town to surround it, but Colonel Mounts did not fully accomplish his part, and left a gap, and Pipe’s wife and children got off, a little fall of snow on the ground. This Pipe was a brother of Captain Pipe[16]. The mother of the Pipes, an old squaw was pursued and shot at repeatedly, when Thomas Ravenscroft[17] ran up to the old squaw and tried to pull her away, but the bullets still flying, and had a ball through his legging; when a Major came up and put a stop to firing, when it was ascertained that the only injury she had received was the loss of an end of a little finger. An old squaw was shot by Lieut. [John] Hamilton[18] and wounded in the leg, mistaking her for a warrior; and a soldier ran up and toniahawked her, and a second ran up and shot her. Pipe shot and wounded Captain Scott and disabled his arm, and when nearly ready to shoot again, some one shot Pipe, and Reasin Virgin passing sunk the tomahawk in his head. Then commenced a wild yelling and shooting, without giving the least heed to the officers. A few cabins only were there, a little plunder obtained. This was about midday in February or March.
That afternoon a party started off for a small Indian settlement several miles up the Mahoning at a place called the Salt Licks.[19] Simon Girty went as pilot. They did not reach the place until in the night, found the warriors all absent hunting, found a few squaws there, and took [one] prisoner and brought her off, the others were left. A small Indian boy out with a gun shooting birds was discovered and killed, and several claimed the honor; and it was left to Girty to decide, and his decision was that one Zach. Connell[20] killed the lad.
At the first town, the mother of Pipe was left in the town. An old Dutchman scalped the squaw that had been killed, and put the scalp in his wallet with his provisions, and in swimming a stream on return the Dutchman lost off his wallet, and exclaimed pathetically “0, I loss my prosock and my scuip.” This was long a byword with the troops.
* * * * * * * *
This campaign of Hand’s was better known as the Squaw campaign.[21] Hand was greatly displeased, and doubtless it contributed greatly towards his leaving the frontiers and rejoining the main army.[22]
February 5, 1778
The military records show that John Dodson was inducted into by Lt. James Brice. This process took place February 5, 1778 in Annapolis, Anne Arundel County, Maryland. [23] Lt. James Brice was the son of Captain John Brice. St. John's parich register shows that on November 19, 1761 Sarah Bryce, the second daughter of Captain John Bryce of Annapolis, Anne Arundel County, Maryland was married to Richard Henderson. [24]This wedding took place while the McKinnon family was associated with St. John's parish. Thus it is likely that Eleanor knew the Brice Family and they could have acted to bring John Dodson and Eleanor (Howard) McKinnon together.
The register for the military unit being formed in Annapolis shows the following enlistments:
Name Rank Date Enlisted Date Discharged Remarks
Majors. Jno pbt February 4, 1778 August 16, 1881 Prisoner
Dodson John Pvt February 5, 1778 June 11, 1778 Discharged
Pringic. John Pvt 6 February 6, 1778 August 16, 1880 Missing
Rady. Laurence Pvt February 7, 1778 July 8, 1779 Deserted
Cheney. John Pvt February 10, 1778
Timms. Edward Pvt February 11, 1778 November 1, 1880 Present
Therefore it appears that John Dodson was not part of any group but rather enlisted himself on that date.[25]
February 5, 1778: During the American Revolution South Carolina became the first state to ratify the Articles of Confederation, which was the first document of national governance for the newly created United States of America which was still fighting Great Britain to gain its independence.[26]
February 5, 1778: John Dodson voluntarily enlisted on February 5, 1778. The marriage license to John and Eleanor was
issued on February 17, 1778. John passed muster on February 27, 1778. John Dodson, the first child
of Eleanor and John was bom on December 25. 1778(65). Thus, Eleanor was about three months
pregnant and probably the reason for John's discharge on June 11, 1778.
But why would Eleanor have used the surname Howard rather than McKinnon when obtaining the
marriage license? [27]
February 5, 1781 Colonel William Crawford resigns his position in the Army. He sat as Justice for Youghiogheny Co., VA.
February 5, Colonel William Crawford was to attend meetings on February 5 and May 8. He did not attend.[28]
February 5, 1782
Morgantown record, Book 1, 1780-1830, the dates of Feb. 5th and May 8th 1782, Col. William Crawford was scheduled to attend, but did not appear. Many times the author has wondered about the reason William Crawford, which kept him away from this meeting on these two given dates. (1782 was the year of the Ohio Sandusky Expedition, on which Col. Crawford was killed). Had he lived, he would have been a very rich man.[29]
February 5,1782: The Spanish defeated British garrison on Minorca and captured the island. When Minorca had become an English possession in 1713, the English willingly offered “asylum to thousands of Jews” who responded in large enough numbers to justify the building of at least one synagogue. However, when the English left the island after this defeat, the Jews left too. After all, Spain was still the land of the Inquisition.[30]
February 5, 1791: The prisoner was of course removed into Elbert county. . . .
Upon the trial, the first evidence produced on the part of the state was the daughter of the prisoner, and the wife of the deceased; Rebecca Smith. In coming to the book to be sworn she exhibited those demonstrations of distress which were to be expected from her sex; from a wife who had seen an affectionate husband murdered in her presence, and of their children; from a daughter who was to convict and bring to the gibbet, an aged father, to whom she owed her being. Encouraged by the Court, she deposed, That there had been a difference of some standing between her father and husband. That on Monday before the fact happened, her husband went to Petersburg with tobacco, and she went to
meeting. That, in their absence, a wench of her father's came to their house, and whipped two of the children. That she sent to her father, and requested him to correct the negroe, or that her husband would when he came home; which he refused to do. That the next day, and before the return of her husband, her father sent for a dirk that had been at their house a long time. Then when her husband came home, she was telling him of the children being whipped, and one of them came in, and said that grand-daddy was coming down to an out-house close by. That her husband then proposed going down to persuade him to correct the negroe, which she approved of. That presently after she went down, and found them quarrelling; and the old man ordered her away, saying that he had as live kill her as her husband, and then ordered his negroe to get an axe, and kill her husband. That he had then the dirk in his hand, which he had sent for the day before, and swore bitterly that he would kill him. That her husband repeatedly desired to be at peace, and proposed to sit down on a log and talk the matter over. That her father refused, and told him to get a gun, and he would fight him equal. That her father had worked himself up to a violent rage, and having the dirk in his hand, her husband threw away a switch which he had broke, as she supposed, to whip the negroes, and took up a small forked stick to defend himself. That he afterwards threw away this stick, and went to the house for another. That he returned, and still offered peace; and letting his stick fall, and turning from the old man, he rushed by her and stabbed her husband in the side. That, as he pulled the dirk from the wound, he said he was a dead man, and the prisoner damned him,. and said he got what he deserved. That, after she had got her husband to the house, he began to be very ill; and she called her father; and that he came, with the dirk still in his hand, looked in his face, and said it was no matter, it was good enough. That her husband afterwards desired to see him, but he did not come. The deceased died of the wound the next day. In the cross examination of this witness, it appeared that when her father threatened her life, her husband wrung the stick in the old man's face, and told him he should not hurt her. But that he was entirely pacified at the time of being stabbed; and that she verily believed her father sent for the dirk the day before for that purpose, although some meat hooks and other things were sent for at the same time. That the ground on which the wound had been given belonged to the deceased; but had been planted by the old man the season before without rent. Mark Smith, son of the deceased, aged sixteen years, of apparent discretion, deposed to the like effect; with the addition, that, about two weeks before, he heard his grandfather tell his father that he had a great mind to kill him. John Baker, an indifferent person, swore, that about two or three weeks before the fact, he went with the deceased to the prisoner's house. That the old man quarrelled with both, and threatened to kill the deceased, offered to fight a duel with guns, &c. which the deceased. There was no evidence as to the fact offered on the part of the prisoner, or to anything else that was material. His counsel, in the course of the most lengthy arguments, labored to bring the homicide within the description of manslaughter; and assimilated it to the case of the King of England versus Reason and Traitor. On the part of the state it was contended, with a becoming zeal, that the prisoner had been guilty of the crime of murder. The trial continued from ten o'clock in the morning to about seven in the evening, the judge charged the jury to the following effect. That, from the testimony before us, it was our duty, to select those portions of it which palpably establish the facts for and against the prisoner. and 1. to examine what kind of killing the prisoner has been guilty of. It was presently after the deceased had come home, that the prisoner came towards the out house, and that the deceased met him there to prevail with him to correct the negroes for beating the children. This the prisoner refusing, and the deceased threatening to do it himself, the fatal quarrel was produced which her in death; and the prisoner is guilty of murder, or not guilty, as the evidence will go to establish this as connected with any preceding quarrel, or shall be short of it. If this quarrel could be extracted from all others, and the event considered by itself, it could only be adjudged man-slaughter. But, when we consider the several portions of evidence on this ground, 1. That there had long existed a quarrel between the prisoner and the deceased. 2. That the quarrel was renewed by a negroe of the prisoner beating the children of the deceased in the absence of parents. 3. That the weapon was sent for upon that occasion, and after the mother had sent a message to the prisoner with a complaint. 4. That two or three weeks before the prisoner threatened the life of the deceased. 5. That the prisoner had the same weapon he had sent for the day before in his hand upon that occasion; and with all his conduct towards the deceased after the fact was committed. The judge said, to take all these things together, we shall feel our minds involuntarily influenced to believe that the killing was of that deliberate and malevolent kind which constitutes murder. But he did not want to impress his opinion on the minds of the jury. It was their province to determine on the distinction which he had stated. If, from the evidence, they should be of the opinion that the quarrel, at the time of the death, was unconnected with any other, they would not find him guilty of murder, but of man-slaughter. . .
The jury having retired returned in about twelve minutes, finding the prisoner guilty of Murder.
. . . Sentence of death was passed, to be executed the 22d instant. Upon the whole, the Judge, in making this Report, feels it a duty to add, that he does not conceive that the criminal has any claim upon the mercy of his country. The life of an unimpeached citizen was wantonly taken away; and if human punishments are ever necessary, he conceives it is son in the present instance. . .
For the prosecution, the Attorney-General, Mr. Walker and Mr. Dickenson. For the prisoner, Mr. Blackbourn, Mr. Seaborn Jones, Mr. Williams and the elder Carnes. Given at my Chambers in Augusta, the 5th day February, (February 5, 1791) George Walton[31]
February 5, 1802:
Andrew Jackson elected Major General of Tennessee militia [32]
(2nd cousin 6x removed).
· February 5, 1811[36] – January 29, 1820: His Royal Highness The Prince Regent[33] (16th cousin 6x removed)
February 5, 1811: In late 1810, George III was once again overcome by his malady following the death of his youngest daughter, Princess Amelia. Parliament agreed to follow the precedent of 1788; without the King's consent, the Lord Chancellor affixed the Great Seal of the Realm to letters patent naming Lords Commissioners. The Lords Commissioners, in the name of the King, signified the granting of the Royal Assent to a bill that became the Regency Act of 1811. Parliament restricted some of the powers of the Prince Regent (as the Prince of Wales became known). The constraints expired one year after the passage of the Act.[35] The Prince of Wales became Prince Regent on February 5, 1811.[36]
The Regent let his ministers take full charge of government affairs, playing a far lesser role than his father. The principle that the crown accepts as prime minister the person supported by a majority in the House of Commons, whether the king personally favours him or not, became established.[37] His governments, with little help from the Regent, presided over victory in the Napoleonic Wars, negotiated the peace settlement, and attempted to deal with the social and economic malaise that followed. One of the most important political conflicts facing the country concerned Catholic emancipation, the movement to relieve Roman Catholics of various political disabilities. The Tories, led by the Prime Minister, Spencer Perceval, were opposed to Catholic emancipation, while the Whigs supported it. At the beginning of the Regency, the Prince of Wales was expected to support the Whig leader, William Grenville, 1st Baron Grenville. He did not, however, immediately put Lord Grenville and the Whigs in office. Influenced by his mother, he claimed that a sudden dismissal of the Tory government would exact too great a toll on the health of the King (a steadfast supporter of the Tories), thereby eliminating any chance of a recovery.[38][34]
February 5, 1822: Thomas G. Watkins visited the Hermitage and obtained a reconciliation with Andrew Jackson.[35]
FINAL PAYMENT RECORD
February 5, 1845: Date of death of Nancy Vance is given as February 8, 1845. Payment made to Law. Marx, Atty., February 5, 1846. Ricmond Roll. No other genealogical data of interest.[36]
February 5, 1861
From J. W. McElroy[37]
Jacks Creek Yancy Co N Ca
To Zebulon Baird Vance (3rd cousin 6x removed)
Yours of the 23rd ult from Washington was Received last mail and I was pleased to hear from you as it was the first thing I had Received from you Since you returned there last fall. As to my papers I would like to continue it until I see how Maters will terminate Relative to this Union, I see we are to have a Convention the Election to come off 21st Instant.[38] I do not know who will Run as a candidate in this County bur I suppose. Pearson, [39] Broyles[40] or old Sam Byrd,[41] as I understand thay all want to be Elected to that body. I Suppose a disunion Man will be Elected.[42] I have no time my self to attend any Maters of the kind I am engaged in an other Mans business and my whole time and attention is Required in his business. If you Renew my Subscription for the Intellengencer[43] I will pay you the money on your Return and also for last year.
Give my best Respects to your lady & Children.
Washington.[44][45]
From W. W. Lenoir[46]
To Zebulon B. Vance
Lenoir N. C. February 5, 1861
Please excuse me for troubling you again with a letter on politics. I shall write in great hast, as the mail will soon be closed. Events are hurrying to their consummation with fearful rapidity. It has become apparent that the border Slave States, including North Carolina and Tennessee, are willing to accept the Crittenden Compromise.[47] It has also become apparent that the North are willing to grant it, that a little delay is all that is needed in order that the awakened people of the North may oust the political leaders who have so grossly deceived them, and give them sanction at the ballot box to that just and honorable compromise. But the country has scarcely time to begin to breathe easily in the dawn of returning peaceful counsels, when hope is again obscured by another dark cloud rising in the seceded States. In the consummation of this compromise which would keep the border Slave States in the Union, the seceded States see the commerce of St. Louis and Louisville and Memphis, and Nshville slipping from their grasp to enrich the seaports of the Union. If they can make the sea ports of the Union foreign ports to those four great western cities, they will have secured for their own ports a prize of inestimable value. For this brilliant prize they are willing to play the perious game of war. They know that war will defeat the compromise. They know that if they can inaugurate a state of War with the North that the border Slave States cannot stand on the side of the North in that war. Of this the gallant devotion of those states to sourhern interests gives confirmation strong as holy writ. War then must separate us from the north. The Seceeding Stats know and safely calculate upon that. What will we do when we have separated from the north: The seceded States have many chances in their favor, that we will join them, and gallantly take the brunt of the war upon ourselfes. In the madness of the hour we will be almost compelled to do so. Yet there is a wiser course for us, if some skillful pilot could sieze the helm, and guide us into it. Why should we take upon us a war waged in defiance of our wishes, our counsels our policy and our interests, to forward the interests and selfish ambition of the states which wage it, and which in doing so treat us not as equals, but as dependants? I belive that our best interests would be more truly consulted, if, in the event of war we withdrew from the north and constituted ourselves an armed neutrality. I believe that if we did so the great northwest which is so closely allied to the border slave states in every great interest, would join them in the attitude of neutrality instead of seeking to fight them across the Ohio. The fight would thus whittle down to a broil between New Engand and South Carolina and such of their excited neighbors as were mad enough to join in with them. It would then soon become apparent to those engaged in the fight that it was not a respectable fight, and they would get ashamed and quit. If the war is once commenced I believe that the course I have indicated would be the wisest way to smother it out, and for the best treatment of it that could be adopted by the border slave states. I have only a faint hope that such a plan could be carried in to effect.
The war might be entiresly prevented and the secessionists thoroughly whipped, by the immediate withdrawal of the troops from the Southern forts. I have but little hope that the administration can be induced to take this course; yet how obvious it is that it would achieve for it a brilliant and gloodless victory! Perhaps if the compromise convention now in session in Washington [48] would urge this course upon the President he might be induced to adopt it. Is it not worth their attention? Perhaps if that convention finds that there is no way to prevent the seceded states from playing their last great card of War, they will fdo well to devise a plan of trumping that card with the armed neutrality of the border states. Perhaps the suggestions which I have trown out so hurriedly have occurred to a thousand minds and been thrown out from a thouseand other pens and tongues, but your will doubtless be pleased to hear the view of one of your constituents though they may present nothing new. Ir you think it worth while, please show this to Governor Morehead, if the convention of which he is a member is still in session. I will be pleased to hear from you. If you find a spare moment to devote to me.
Washington.[49] [50]
Fri. February 5, 1864:
Left cario at 2 pm passed Columbus[51] KY hickman Ky both small land bluffy
William Harrison Goodlove Civil War Diary
February 5-7, 1865: Battle of Hatcher’s Run, VA.[52]
February 5, 1879: Zebulon Baird Vance
37th and 43rd Governor of North Carolina
In office
January 1, 1877 – February 5, 1879[53]
February 5, 1937: In an article published in the Evening Standard, Winston Churchill “continued to issue his warnings about the growing menace of Nazi tyranny.”[54]
February 5, 1941: On this day in 1941, Adolf Hitler scolds his Axis partner, Benito Mussolini, for his troops' retreat in the face of British advances in Libya, demanding that the Duce command his forces to resist.
Since 1912, Italy had occupied Libya because of purely economic "expansion" motives. In 1935, Mussolini began sending tens of thousands of Italians to Libya, mostly farmers and other rural workers, in part to relieve overpopulation concerns in Italy. So by the time of the outbreak of the Second World War, Italy had enjoyed a long-term presence in North Africa, and Mussolini began dreaming of expanding that presence--always with an eye toward the same territories that the old "Roman Empire" had counted among its conquests.
Also sitting in North Africa were British troops, which, under a 1936 treaty, were garrisoned in Egypt to protect the Suez Canal and Royal Navy bases at Alexandria and Port Said. Hitler had offered to aid Mussolini early on in his North African expansion, to send German troops to help fend off a British counterattack. But Mussolini had been rebuffed when he had offered Italian assistance during the Battle of Britain. He now insisted that as a matter of national pride, Italy would have to create a Mediterranean sphere of influence on its own--or risk becoming a "junior" partner of Germany's.
But despite expansion into parts of East Africa and Egypt, Mussolini's forces proved no match for the Brits in the long run. British troops pushed the Italians westward, inflicting extraordinary losses on the Axis forces in an attack at Beda Fomm. As Britain threatened to push the Italians out of Libya altogether and break through to Tunisia, Mussolini swallowed his pride and asked Hitler for assistance. Hitler reluctantly agreed (it would mean the first direct German-British encounter in the Mediterranean)--but only if Mussolini stopped the Italians' retreat and kept the British out of Tripoli, the Libyan capital. But the Italians continued to be overwhelmed; in three months, 20,000 men were wounded or killed and 130,000 were taken prisoner. Only with the arrival of German Gen. Erwin Rommel would the Italian resistance be strengthened against further British advances. Even with Germany's help, Italy was able to defend its North African territory only until early 1943.[55]
February 5, 1941 : The Law for the Protection of the State is passed in Romania, making Romanian Jews subject to double the punishment meted out to other Romanians for crimes committed.[56]
February 5, 1942
USS Enterprise arrived at Pearl Harbor, US Territory of Hawaii.
Uncle Howard Snell is on board the USS Enterprise.[57]
The Consequences
Enterprise and Task Force 8 returned to Pearl Harbor on February 5, receiving a far different welcome than they'd been given in the wake of the December 7 attack. Daring and, more importantly, successful, the raid was the Navy's first significant victory in the Pacific War. Enterprise, her men, and the ships accompanying her were hailed as heroes upon their return, saluted by cheers from men on ships in the anchorage and personnel on shore.
Particularly after the war, it became evident that the damage inflicted during the raid fell short of initial estimates, not to mention newspaper reports which trumpeted the raid as a Japanese Pearl Harbor. Nonetheless, Enterprise's Air Group packed a punch. At Kwajalein, one transport and two smaller vessels were sunk, and another eight ships damaged, roughly half the number originally reported sunk. Nine planes were destroyed on the ground at Taroa and Roi, and three Claudes shot down over the atolls, at the cost of one VF-6 Wildcat and five SBDs. Numerous installations were destroyed throughout the northern Marshalls.
The real significance of the raid was not found on the balance sheet of damage inflicted and suffered, but in the lessons learned. Halsey's action report repeatedly notes the poor performance of the ship's anti-aircraft batteries, stating:
"The inability of the 5" AA battery to knock down the formation of enemy twin-engine bombers ... is a matter of grave concern. ... AA Gunnery Practices [should] be scheduled when opportunity offers, with ship steaming at not less than 25 knots. If adequate safeguards can be introduced, ship should be required to make radical changes of course."
In their first encounter with their Japanese counterparts, the Air Group came away less than impressed, noting the Japanese fighters seemed easily discouraged when faced with two or three SBDs working together defensively. Both the Air Group and the ship's company gained valuable combat experience, making them much better prepared for the carrier-vs-carrier brawls that would mark the late spring and fall of 1942. And though hardly enough to stall the Japanese offensive, the raid served notice to both sides that the striking arm of the U.S. Navy was not lying broken on Pearl Harbor's muddy bottom.[58]
February 5, 1943
Italian dictator Benito Mussolini dismisses Foreign Minister Count Ciano and assumes his duties.[59]
February 5, 1943: For 14 hours the Jews of Birkenau stood in place, in the snow, during a roll call. Then each was beaten, chased or sent to the gas chamber.[60]
February 5, 1943: Rutka Laskier, a fourteen year old living in Bedzin, Poland wrote in her diary: “The rope around us is getting tighter and tighter. Next month there should already be a ghetto, a real one, surrounded by walls. In the summer it will be unbearable. To sit in a gray locked cage, without being able to see fields and flowers. Last year I used to go to the fields; I always had many flowers, and it reminded me that one day it would be possible to go to Malachowska Street without taking the risk of being deported. Being able to go to the cinema in the evening; I'm already so "flooded" with the atrocities of the war that even the worst reports have no effect on me. I simply can't believe that one day I'll be able to leave the house without the yellow star. Or even that this war will end one day ... If this happens, I will probably lose my mind from joy.
But now I need to think about the near future, which is the ghetto. Then it will be impossible to see anyone, neither Micka, who lives in Kamionka C, nor Janek, who lives in D, and not Nica, who lives in D. And then what will happen? Oh, good Lord. Well, Rutka, you've probably gone completely crazy. You are calling upon God as if He exists. The little faith I used to have has been completely shattered. If God existed, He would have certainly not permitted that human beings be thrown alive into furnaces, and the heads of little toddlers be smashed with butts of guns or be shoved into sacks and gassed to death ... It sounds like a fairy tale. Those who haven't seen this would never believe it. But it's not a legend; it's the truth. Or the time when they beat an old man until he became unconscious, because he didn't cross the street properly. This is already absurd; it's nothing, as long as there won't be Auschwitz ... and a green card ... The end ... When will it come? ...”[61]
February 5, 1943: For one week Germans are greeted with an armed uprising as they try to deport the final group of Bialystok Jews. By February 12th, 18,000 were in hiding. Another 10,000 would end up in Treblinka.[62]
February 5-12, 1943: In Bialystok, 2,000 Jews are killed and 10,000 deported to Treblinka; Jews offer armed resistance.[63]
February 5, 1943: Rothke telexzed to the Ordnungspolizei that three convoys were scheduled and that escort commandos of 12 to 15 men had to b e provided. On the same day, Rothke asked the Gestapo in Dijon to transfer the Jews under their command for deportation on February 9 and 11. [64]
February 5, 1963 David Ferrie makes two calls to Dallas today to two unidentified numbers. [65]
February 5, 1987: Princess Anne(11th cousin) assumed the Presidency of the Fédération Équestre Internationale from 1986 until 1994.[21] On February 5, 1987, she became the first Royal to appear as a contestant on a television quiz-show when she competed on the BBC panel game A Question of Sport. Her daughter, Zara Phillips is also a keen equestrian competitor. Together with her horse, Toytown, she won individual and team gold medals at the 2005 European Eventing Championship as well as individual gold and team silver medals at the 2006 FEI World Equestrian Games.
Frances Bowes-Lyon, Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorne: 7th Cousin 3x removed of Gerol Lee Goodlove
Frances Dora Bowes-Lyon, Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorne
Spouse(s)
Claude Bowes-Lyon
Father
Oswald Smith
Mother
Henrietta Mildred Hodgson
Born
(1832-07-29)July 29, 1832
Blendon Hall
Died
February 5, 1922(1922-02-05) (aged 89)
19 Hans Place, Chelsea, London
Burial
Glamis Castle, Angus
Frances Dora Bowes-Lyon, Countess of Strathmore and Kinghorne (née Smith; July 29, 1832 – February 5, 1922) was a British noblewoman. She was the paternal grandmother of Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother and thus a great-grandmother of the current monarch, Queen Elizabeth II.[66]
Death…
She died at 19 Hans Place, Chelsea, London on February 5, 1922, aged 89. She was buried at Glamis Castle, Angus, the family seat of the Earls of Strathmore and Kinghorne.[67]
February 5, 1971: Grover Rowell (b. December 25, 1892 in GA / d. February 5, 1971 in GA).[68]
On February 5, 2013: Professor Caroline Wilkinson of the University of Dundee conducted a forensic facial reconstruction of Richard III, (5th cousin 17x removed) commissioned by the Richard III Society, based on 3D mappings of his skull. The face is described as "warm, young, earnest and rather serious".[100]
Titles, styles and honours
Bronze boar mount thought to have been worn by a supporter of Richard III[101][69]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] mike@abcomputers.com
[2] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[3] http://www.brookecountywvgenealogy.org/CONNELL.html
[4] The River Clyde to Tymochtee and Col. William Crawford by Grace U. Emahiser, 1969 p.42.`
[5] The Brothers Crawford, Allen W. Scholl, 1995
[6] http://www.relivinghistoryinc.org/Timeline---Historic-Events.html
[7] (From River Clyde to Tymochtee and Col. William Crawford, by Grace U. Emahiser, 1969, page 118.)
[8] Diary of David McClure, New York, Knickerbocker Press, 1899, p. 108 The Brothers Crawford, Scholl, 1995, p. 24-25.
[9] (http://washburnhill.freehomepage.com/custom3.html)
[10] http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/georgia-constitution-abolishes-primogeniture-and-entail
[11] That Dark and Bloody River, Allan W. Eckert 3NN95 Transcript. Draper Series, Volume III Frontier Defense on the Upper Ohio, 1777-1778 Wisconsin Historical Society pgs. 201-202
[12] 80 Providence Mounts was a Marylander by birth, and is said to have been with Washington at Fort Necessity. In 1768 he removed to the Youghiogheny, in what is now Connellsville township of Fayette County, where he erected a mill on a creek which there emptied into the river. During the Revolution he was colonel of the 2nd battalion of Westmoreland militia, and in addition to this expedition served in the pursuit of the savage enemy after the sack of Hannastown (1782). He died at his home in 1784, and after his decease his land was patented to his descendants.—Eo.
[13] 81 Capt. David Scott was born on the South Branch of Potomac River, but in I7~O? he moved to the Monongahela, near the site of the present Granville—a town founded by his son Felix Scott.—Monongalia County, West Va. Captain Scott built one or more mills in the vicinity, and was a prominent resident. In i7~? Indians murdered his daughters Fanny and Phebe as they were taking dinner to men in the hayfield. Later, a son named James barely escaped capture. An old house said to have been built by Captain Scott in 1776, was lately standing on the farm of the Gapen family, who descended from Captain Scott’s youngest daughter.—ED.
[14] 82 Nothing more appears in reference to this guide. According to Samuel Murphy’s recollections, he was not of the family of Samuel Brady.—Eo.
[15]The first of these two streams is usually written Neshannock. The village raided must have been on the site of the present town of Newcastle, Mercer County, Pa. This was probably part of the Kuskuskies towns (see ante, note 45), which originally were built by the Iroquois. These villages seem to have still been their abode when Washington visited the West in 1753. The latter did not enter Kuskuskies, but passed near it on his route from Logstown to Venango. After the opening of the French and Indian War, the Iroquois abandoned this region, which was then given over to the Delawares, who had important settlements on Beaver Creek and its branches. There the Moravian envoy Frederick Christian Post visited them in the summer of 1758. He describes Kuskuskies as composed of four towns, some distance apart, and says that at one of them the French had built houses for the Delawares; probably it was on the site of Newcastle. In the period between the English capture of Fort Duquesne (1758), and Pontiac’s War (1763), the Delaware tribesmen withdrew in large measure to the Tuscarawas and Muskingum. The village raided by Hand’s warriors —would appear to have been at this time (1778) inconsiderable, with few vestiges of its former importance.—En.
[16] Captain Pipe. Hopocan (Tobacco Pipe) and Konieschquanokee (Maker of Light/Maker of Day). (1724-1794). A hereditary sachem of the wolf clan of the Delaware (Munsee). His early life is unclear, but the presumption is that he was raised along the Susquehanna River and moved to the Ohio Country in the 1750s. He is mentioned at a conference with George Croghan and Hugh Mercer together with other Indian warriors at Fort Pitt in July 1759. He fought in both the French and Indian War as well as in Pontiac’s Rebellion. Captain Pipe urged the Moravians Christian Post and John Heckewelder to persuade the settlers to come to Indian land to trade—not to settle. In other words, come as did the French. Pipe preferred the French Jesuits to the Moravians. He emphasized that the Indian would no longer be pushed west as had happened to those along the Delaware and Susquehanna Rivers. Pipe attempted a ruse on the forces at Fort Pitt in 1763, but was found out and was held as a prisoner. He resented the “take it or leave it” peace proposal of Henry Bouquet in 1764. Captain Pipe, as a principal Delaware chief, attended the conferences at Fort Pitt in 1765 and 1768. Perhaps his most important trip to Fort Pitt was in May 1774, when he and other chiefs went to Fort Pitt to talk with John Connolly, George Croghan and others about the murder of members of Chief John Logan's family. The failure of Captain Pipe and his fellow chiefs to gain satisfaction was a major lead-in to Dunmore's War.
During the American Revolution he was a leader among the Delaware in support of the British. In 1778, General Edward Hand’s forces killed his mother, brother and some of his children. In spite of this action, he and his grandson Killbuck with White Eyes signed an agreement with the Continental Congress. In 1778, the commandant of Fort Pitt, General McIntosh, requested permission from Captain Pipe to move through his Ohio territory in order to attack the British at Detroit. Pipe agreed and McIntosh built Fort Laurens in eastern, OH, to protect the Delaware against the British and encroaching White settlers.
When Colonel Daniel Brodhead attacked and destroyed the Delaware village at Coshocton, OH, Pipe moved solidly into the British camp. Captain Pipe disagreed with the Christian conversion of many of his Delaware brothers and "seceded" from his Indian nation in order to fight the White people. He and his followers captured Colonel William Crawford in a battle around Upper Sandusky, OH, in 1782. This is the event where Crawford was tortured before being killed. Captain Pipe is said to have been the one to paint Crawford's face black—the mark condemning a prisoner to death. When Simon Girty attempted to intercede, Pipe threatened to kill him as well. This is perhaps the single event that marks the life of Captain Pipe.
After the Revolutionary War, Pipe attended and signed the Treaty of Fort MacIntosh in 1785 and the treaty at Fort Finney in 1786. He fought against General Harmar in 1790 and in 1791 against General St. Clair. He is believed to have died a few days before the Battle of Fallen Timbers (August 20, 1794).
Colonists who talked to Captain Pipe, such as George Croghan and David Heckewelder, spoke of him being “sensible, clever, sober….” Although 1794 is generally accepted at the date of his death, some argue he lived until 1812-14. The confusion may result from his son also carrying the name "Captain Pipe."
http://www.thelittlelist.net/cadtocle.htm
[17] 84 Thomas Ravenscroft was born about 1750, and brought up in the family of Col. William Crawford. His first military service was in Dunmore’s army in 1774; the next year (1775) he enlisted in Capt. John Stephenson’s company, and later joined the 13th Virginia under Colonel Russell. Discharged at the close of 1777 or early in 1778, he was out with Hand on this expedition, and in 1781 enlisted under Clark for service in an expedition to Detroit, with a commission as lieutenant. Clark’s expedition having been abandoned, Ravenscroft‘as employed in guarding the frontier. When out with Col. John Floyd in September, 1781, he was captured and taken prisoner to Detroit—see original letter of Floyd, relating this event, in Draper MSS., 51J89. From Detroit he was sent down to Montreal and there (June 20, 1782) made his escape, but was shortly recaptured—see Canadian Archives. 1887, p. 307. At the close of the Revolution, Ravenscroft was exchanged and returned to Kentucky, where he married either the widow or daughter of Col. John Hinkston. He was living in Harrison County, Ky., as late as 1823.—ED.
[18] 85 Lieut. John Hamilton lived in what is now Washington County, Pa. In the autumn of 1775 he enlisted in the 13th Virginia and served in the Eastern army, being at the battles at head of Elk River, at Brandywine, and Germantown. He would seem to have been ordered to Fort Pitt late in 1777, and to have served in the West until his discharge on Nov. 23, 1778. Ten years later he moved to Ohio with Stites and Symmes, who were settling the Miami country. Hamilton was employed as an Indian trader, and died in Ohio in 1822. For much of this information, our thanks are due to Mr. John S. Hunt of Chicago—En.
[19] 86 For the location of Salt Lick Town, see ante, p. 178, note 45. The town at this site was, according to the testimony of John McCullough, a captive living at the place, built in 1755. During the French and Indian and Pontiac’s wars it was a place of much importance, and several prisoners were brought there to be delivered to General Bouquet (1764). After that, however, the town declined, but the lick was frequented for salt-making until 1804, when a final skirmish occurred between the aborigines and the intruding white settlers—ED.
[20] 87 Zachariah Connell, founder of the Pennsylvania town named Connellsville in his honor, was a native of Virginia (1741) and settled upon this site about 1770. With him came his brother James, who married Anne, daughter of Col. William Crawford. In 1776 Zachariah was appointed captain of militia for Yohogania County, and one of the justices for the same. He was very regular in attendance at county court, as the records show. Connell was a surveyor and laid out a large landed estate for himself; he acted also as business agent for prominent Eastern investors in Western lands. In 1793 he chartered the town bearing his name; and in 1800 built the first bridge over the river at this place. He died at his home in the village Aug. 26, 1813. At the time of his death he was building a large stone house, which still stands in the borough of Connellsville.—En.
[21] 88 The British report of this misadventure is given in Mich. Pion. & Hist. Colls., ix. p. 436: “A party from Fort Pitt had fallen on a Delaware Village and killed or carried off eight persons, but unfortunately for the Rebels they have struck in the wrong place and have sent back two squaws who were prisoners to atone for their error.”—En.
[22] Draper Series, Volume III Frontier Defense on the Upper Ohio, 1777-1778, Wisconsin Historical Society, Madison pgs. 215-220
[23] . (Muster Rolls & Other Records of Service of Maryland Troops in the American Revolution, 1775-1783. Muster of Maryland Troops, Vol. 1, First Regimant, Genealogical Publishing Co) ., Inc. Baltimore, MD, 1972.)
[24] (Maryland State Archives, St. John's Parish Records, Microfilm Roll M 229. Page 331.)
[25] (http://washburnhill.freehomepage.com/custom3.html)
[26] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[27] http://washburnhill.freehomepage.com/custom3.html
[28] The Brothers Crawford, Allen W. Scholl, 1995
[29] (From River Clyde to Tymochtee and Col. William Crawford, by Grace U. Emahiser, 1969, page 118.)
[30] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[31] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe.
[32] http://www.wnpt.org/productions/rachel/timeline/1791_1811.html
[33] wikipedia
[34] wikipedia
[35] The Papers of Andrew Jackson, Volume V, 1821-1824
[36] Ancestors of Forrest Roger Garnett p. 910.12
[37] John W. McElroy (1808-1886), a prominent merchant and farmer of Yancey County, was the father-in-law of Vance’s brother, Robert B. Vance, and colonel of the Yancey Militia. In September of 1863 he was appointed a brigadier general in the Home Guards by Governor Vance. Asheville Spectator, May 11, 1853, Asheville News, November 8, 1855; Clark, N. C. Regts., IV, 651, V. 7.
[38] The election of delegates was scheduled for February 28, 1861.
[39] Probably Isaac A. Pearson.
[40] Probably J. M. Broyles, postmaster at Burnsville.
[41] Samuel D. Byrd, of Burnsville, who became lieutenant colonel of the Seventy second Battalion of Home Guards in 1863. Clark, N. C. Regt, IV, 656.
[42] The delegate from Yancey to the Convention of 1861 was Milton Pinkney Penland 1813-1880), a merchant who usually refused political preferment, who was known as a conservative man in politics, but who was a pronounced secessionist after the election of Lincoln, McCormick, Personnel, pp. 66=67. In the election of February 28, 1861, the people voted down a convention, and Penland was elected later to represent Yancy County.
[43] The National Intelligencer was a well-known conservative paper published in Washington , D. C. A daily since 1813, it was usually the “recognized organ” of the Whig administrations.
[44] A. L. S. Z. B. Vance Papers, State Department of Archives and History, Raleigh
[45] The Papers of Zebulon Baird Vance, Edited by Frontis W. Johnston, page 96.
[46] Lenoir had just returned, in the fall of 1860, from a trip throughout the middle west, and his letters reflect his realization of the importance of the commerce of that section to the Sourth. Lenoir Papers, passim.
[47] The proposal of Senator Crittenden, the most notable of the compromise plans presented in Congress, was concerned primarily with slavery in the territories. I t did not concern itself with the slavery issue as such so much as it treated the issue of the impingement of federal jurisdiction upon slavery. To remove the question of slavery from the realm of federal activity, therefore, it was necessary to deal with it in limited and specific areas, such as territories, arsenals, and forts. On some of the minor aspects of the slavery question statuatory action was deemed sufficient; among his resolutions were those which called for the faithful execution of the Fugitive Slave Law, the repeal of the Personal Liberty Acts, and the enforcement of the laws prohibiting the foreign slave trade. But the heart of Crittenden’s proposition had to do with the territorial question, where the success of compromise depended upon comprehensiveness. Accordingly, Crittenden propsed to make his compromise irrevocable by embodying the major part of it in a series of unalterable Constitutional amendments which “no future amendment of the Constituion shall affect.” He proposed amendments to the Constitution to provide that the territories be divided along the line of thirty thirty minutes; that slavery be forever prohibited in the territory north of that line; that it be allowed to go into the region south of that line and receive congressional protection there so long as the area remained under territorial governments; that when a state shold be organized in the southern area the people thereof could exclude or maintain slavery as they desired; that the United Staes guarantee payment for excaped slaves; that slavery be protected in the states in which it sas legal; and that Congress should not interfere with the interstate slave trade. Crittenden introduce d his resolutions on December 18, 1860; on December 22 they were defeated in committee; in the last hours of the session they were allowed to come to a vote in Congress and were defeated; in the Senated 20 to 19; in the House of Representatives 113 to 80. In the Senated not one affirmative vote was Republican, but every negative vote was Republican. In the House of Representatives the minority of 80 contained not one Republican, and 110 of the 113 negative votes were cast by Republicans. Cong. Globe.
[48] The Peace Convention , a conference of twenty one states which assembled in Wahington on February 4, 1861, at the call of the Viginia Legislature.
[49] A.L. S. Z. B. Vance Papers, State Department of Archives and History, Raleigh.,
[50] The Papers of Zebulon Baird Vance, edited by Frontis W. Johnston, page 97-98
[51] Arrived at Columbus at 4 o’clock made a short stop and then proceeded on our journey everything going off smoothly. (Rollins Diary) http://ipserv2.aea14.k12.ia.us/iacivilwar/Resources/rollins diary.htm
[52] (State Capital Memorial, Austin, TX, February 11, 2012.)
[53] Wikipedia
[54] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[55] http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/hitler-to-mussolini-fight-harder
[56] Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor, page 1764.
[57] http://www.theussenterprise.com/battles.html
[58] http://www.cv6.org/1942/marshalls/marshalls_2.htm
[59] On This Day in America by John Wagman.
[60] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[61] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[62] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[63] Encyclopedia of the Holocaust, Israel Gutman, Editor, page 1775
[64] Memorial to the Jews Deported from France, 1942-1944 by Serge Klarsfeld, page 360-361.
[65] http://www.assassinationresearch.com/v2n1/chrono1.pdf
[66] Wikipedia
[67] Wikipedia
[68] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe
[69] Wikipedia
No comments:
Post a Comment