https://www.facebook.com/ThisDayInGoodloveHistory
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Jeff-Goodlove/323484214349385
Join me on http://www.linkedin.com/
Jeff Goodlove email address: Jefferygoodlove@aol.com
Surnames associated with the name Goodlove have been spelled the following different ways; Cutliff, Cutloaf, Cutlofe, Cutloff, Cutlove, Cutlow, Godlib, Godlof, Godlop, Godlove, Goodfriend, Goodlove, Gotleb, Gotlib, Gotlibowicz, Gotlibs, Gotlieb, Gotlob, Gotlobe, Gotloeb, Gotthilf, Gottlieb, Gottliebova, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlow, Gutfrajnd, Gutleben, Gutlove
The Chronology of the Goodlove, Godlove, Gottlob, Gottlober, Gottlieb (Germany, Russia, Czech etc.), and Allied Families of Battaile, (France), Crawford (Scotland), Harrison (England), Jackson (Ireland), Jefferson, LeClere (France), Lefevre (France), McKinnon (Scotland), Plantagenets (England), Smith (England), Stephenson (England?), Vance (Ireland from Normandy), Washington, Winch (England, traditionally Wales), including correspondence with George Rogers Clark, and including ancestors William Henry Harrison, Andrew Jackson, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, James Monroe, John Adams, John Quincy Adams and Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Martin Van Buren, Teddy Roosevelt, U.S. Grant, Benjamin Harrison “The Signer”, Benjamin Harrison, Jimmy Carter, Robert E. Lee, Jefferson Davis, William Taft, John Tyler (10th President), James Polk (11th President)Zachary Taylor, and Abraham Lincoln.
The Goodlove Family History Website:
http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/g/o/o/Jeffery-Goodlove/index.html
The Goodlove/Godlove/Gottlieb families and their connection to the Cohenim/Surname project:
• New Address! http://wwwfamilytreedna.com/public/goodlove/default.aspx
• • Books written about our unique DNA include:
• “Abraham’s Children, Race, Identity, and the DNA of the Chosen People” by Jon Entine.
•
• “ DNA & Tradition, The Genetic Link to the Ancient Hebrews” by Rabbi Yaakov Kleiman, 2004.
“Jacob’s Legacy, A Genetic View of Jewish History” by David B. Goldstein
Birthdays on March 5...
Edgar E. Barkley (half 1st cousin of the husband of the 1st cousin 2x removed)
Maj. P. Bowes-Lyon (8th cousin 3x removed)
Harold W. Burnett (2nd cousin 1x removed)
King David II (Scotland) (half 19th great granduncle)
Elizabeth Godlove
Isabel Harrison Martin (3rd cousin 4x removed)
Elmer W. Heald (nephew of the husband of the 1st cousin 2x removed)
Anna (. Lawrence Bacon (3rd great grandmother)
Dianah Martin Martin (3rd cousin 6x removed)
Lyle W. PAGE
Nadine Seniff Godsell (wife of the 2nd great nephew of the wife of the 3rd great granduncle)
Elizabeth Snapp Godlove
Walter T. Warren (husband of the 5th cousin 6x removed)
March 5, 363: Roman Emperor Julian moves from Antioch with an army of 90,000 to attack the Sassanid Empire, in a campaign which will bring to his own death. Julian followed Constantine to the throne and turned back his predecessor’s pro-Christian promulgations. Effectively, his decrees gave validity to other religions previously practiced in the Empire. On his was to fight the Sassanids, Julian gave orders that the Temple in Jerusalem should be rebuilt. His untimely death prevented this from happening. The Sassanids were the Persians of their day.[1]
March 5, 1133: Henry II of England (24th great grandfather)
Henry II
King of England (more...)
Reign
October 25, 1154 – July 6, 1189
Coronation
December 19, 1154
Predecessor
Stephen
Successor
Richard I
Junior king
Henry the Young King
Spouse
Eleanor of Aquitaine
Issue
•Geoffrey, Archbishop of York
•William IX, Count of Poitiers
•Henry the Young King
•Richard I, King of England
•Geoffrey II, Duke of Brittany
•Matilda, Duchess of Saxony
•Eleanor, Queen of CastileL
•Joan, Queen of Sicily, Countess of Toulouse
•John, King of England
•William Longespée, 3rd Earl of Salisbury
House
House of Plantagenet
Father
Geoffrey V, Count of Anjou
Mother
Matilda of England
Born
(1133-03-05)5 March 5, 1133
Le Mans, France
Died
July 6, 1189(1189-07-06) (aged 56)
Chinon, France
Burial
Fontevraud Abbey, France
Henry II (March 5, 1133 – July 6, 1189), also known as Henry Curtmantle (French: Court-manteau), Henry FitzEmpress or Henry Plantagenet, ruled as Count of Anjou, Count of Maine, Duke of Normandy, Duke of Aquitaine, Count of Nantes, King of England (1154–89) and Lord of Ireland; at various times, he also controlled Wales, Scotland and Brittany. Henry was the son of Geoffrey of Anjou and Matilda, who was the daughter of King Henry I and took the title of Empress from her first marriage. He became actively involved by the age of 14 in his mother's efforts to claim the throne of England, and was made the Duke of Normandy at 17. He inherited Anjou in 1151 and shortly afterwards married Eleanor of Aquitaine, whose marriage to the French king Louis VII had recently been annulled. King Stephen agreed to a peace treaty after Henry's military expedition to England in 1153, and Henry inherited the kingdom on Stephen's death a year later. Still quite young, he now controlled what would later be called the Angevin Empire, stretching across much of western Europe.[2]
March 5, 1179: The Third Lateran Council opens at Rome. At the end of the meeting the council would adopt the following as matters of canon law: "Jews should be slaves to Christians and at the same time treated kindly due of humanitarian considerations." ”The testimony of Christians against Jews is to be preferred in all cases where they use their own witnesses against Christians."[3]
Spring 1179: With only the shell of the Castle in place but confident it could withstand a Muslim assault Baldwins builders pack up and leave. The Templars rush to finish the job.
March 5, 1328(23 Adar): After the death of Charles the Fair, Pedro Olligoyen, a Franciscan friar, used the Jews as a scapegoat against French rule. Starting today, Shabbat, all the Jewish houses were pillaged and then destroyed. Approximately 6000 Jews were murdered with 20 survivors. Among the dead were parents and four younger brothers of Menachem ben Zerach, “then barely twenty years old who became a scholar of commanding influence.” He was saved by “a compassionate knight” who was a friend of the young Jew’s father[4].
March 5, 1390: Robert II of Scotland (29th great grandfather)
Peerage of Scotland
Earl of Strathearn
1357–March 5, 1390
Succeeded by
David Stewart
[5]
March 5, 1515: Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk (husband of the 7th cousin 15x removed)
His Grace
The Duke of Suffolk
KG
The Duke of Suffolk, detail of a double wedding portrait attributed to Jan Gossaert, c. 1516.
Lord President of the Council
In office
1530–1545
Monarch
Henry VIII
Preceded by
New office
Succeeded by
The Lord St John
Lord Steward
In office
1541–1544
Monarch
Henry VIII
Preceded by
The Earl of Shrewsbury
Succeeded by
The Lord St John
Personal details
Born
Charles Brandon
c. 1484
Died
1545 (aged 60–61)
Guildford, Surrey Kingdom of England
Resting place
St. George's Chapel, Windsor Castle
Nationality
English
Spouse(s)
Margaret Mortimer
Anne Browne
Mary Tudor, Queen Dowager of France
Catherine Willoughby
Relations
Sir William Brandon (Father)
Elizabeth Bruyn (Mother)
Children
Anne Brandon, Baroness Grey of Powis
Mary Brandon, Baroness Monteagle
Lord Henry Brandon
Frances, Duchess of Suffolk
Eleanor, Countess of Cumberland
Henry Brandon, Earl of Lincoln
Henry Brandon, Duke of Suffolk
Charles Brandon, Duke of Suffolk
Residence
Westhorpe Hall, Suffolk
Occupation
Courtier, Military commander
Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk, 1st Viscount Lisle KG (c. 1484 – August 22, 1545) was the son of Sir William Brandon and Elizabeth Bruyn. Through his third wife Mary Tudor he was brother-in-law to Henry VIII. His father was the standard-bearer of Henry Tudor, Earl of Richmond (later King Henry VII) and was slain by Richard III in person at the battle of Bosworth Field. Suffolk died of unknown causes at Guildford.
Family
Charles Brandon was the son of Sir William Brandon, Henry Tudor's standard-bearer at the Battle of Bosworth Field, where he was slain by Richard III. His mother, Elizabeth Bruyn (d. March 1494), was a granddaughter of Sir Maurice Bruyn (d. November 8, 1466),[1] and the daughter and co-heiress of Sir Henry Bruyn (d. November 30, 1461)[2] by Elizabeth Darcy (died c.1471),[2] daughter of Sir Robert Darcy of Maldon, Essex. Before her marriage to Sir William Brandon, Elizabeth (née Bruyn) had been the wife of Thomas Tyrrell (died c. 13 October 1473), esquire, son of Sir Thomas Tyrrell of Heron and Anne Marney.[3] After Sir William Brandon's death at Bosworth, Elizabeth (née Bruyn) married William Mallory, esquire.[4][2][5]
Brandon had a brother, William, and two sisters, Anne, who married firstly Sir John Shilston, and secondly Sir Gawain Carew, and Elizabeth.[6][4][1]
Political career
Charles Brandon was brought up at the court of Henry VII. He is described by Dugdale as "a person comely of stature, high of courage and conformity of disposition to King Henry VIII, with whom he became a great favourite". Brandon held a succession of offices in the royal household, becoming Master of the Horse in 1513, and received many valuable grants of land. On May 15, 1513, he was created Viscount Lisle, having entered into a marriage contract with his ward, Elizabeth Grey, suo jure Viscountess Lisle. The contract was ended and the title was forfeited as a result of Brandon's marriage to Mary Tudor in 1515.
He distinguished himself at the sieges of Thérouanne and Tournai in the French campaign of 1513. One of the agents of Margaret of Savoy, governor of the Netherlands, writing from before Thérouanne, reminded her that Lord Lisle was a "second king" and advised her to write him a kind letter.
At this time, Henry VIII was secretly urging Margaret to marry Lisle, whom he created Duke of Suffolk, although he was careful to disclaim (on March 4, 1514) any complicity in the project to her father, Maximilian I, Holy Roman Emperor.
After his marriage to Mary, Suffolk lived for some years in retirement, but he was present at the Field of the Cloth of Gold in 1520. In 1523 he was sent to Calais to command the English troops there. He invaded France in company with Floris d'Egmont, Count of Buren, who was at the head of the Flemish troops, and laid waste the north of France, but disbanded his troops at the approach of winter.
After Wolsey's disgrace, Suffolk's influence increased daily. He was sent with Thomas Howard, 3rd Duke of Norfolk, to demand the Great Seal from Wolsey; the same noblemen conveyed the news of Anne Boleyn's marriage to King Henry, after the divorce from Queen Catherine; and Suffolk acted as High Steward at the new queen's coronation. He was one of the commissioners appointed by Henry to dismiss Catherine's household, a task he found distasteful.[citation needed]
His family had a residence on the west side of Borough High Street, London, for at least half a century prior to his building of Suffolk Place at the site.[7]
Suffolk supported Henry's ecclesiastical policy, receiving a large share of the lands after the dissolution of the monasteries. In 1544, he was for the second time in command of an English army for the invasion of France. He died at Guildford, Surrey, on 24 August in the following year. At Henry VIII's expense he was buried at Windsor in St George's Chapel.
Marriage to Mary Tudor
Suffolk took part in the jousts which celebrated the marriage of Mary Tudor, Henry's sister, with Louis XII of France. He was accredited to negotiate various matters with Louis, and on Louis' death was sent to congratulate the new King, Francis I, and to negotiate Mary's return to England.
Love between Suffolk and the young Dowager Queen Mary had existed before her marriage, and Francis roundly charged him with an intention to marry her. Francis, perhaps in the hope of Queen Claude's death, had himself been one of her suitors in the first week of her widowhood, and Mary asserted that she had given him her confidence to avoid his importunities.
Francis and Henry both professed a friendly attitude towards the marriage of the lovers, but Suffolk had many political enemies, and Mary feared that she might again be sacrificed to political considerations. The truth was that Henry was anxious to obtain from Francis the gold plate and jewels which had been given or promised to the Queen by Louis in addition to the reimbursement of the expenses of her marriage with the King; and he practically made his acquiescence in Suffolk's suit dependent on his obtaining them. The pair cut short the difficulties by a private marriage on March 5, 1515. Suffolk announced this to Thomas Wolsey, who had been their fast friend.[6]
Suffolk was saved from Henry's anger only by Wolsey, and the pair eventually agreed to pay to Henry £24,000 in yearly instalments of £1000, and the whole of Mary's dowry from Louis of £200,000, together with her plate and jewels.[7]
March 5th, 1558 - Smoking tobacco introduced in Europe by Francisco Fernandes[8]
March 5, 1580:. — Esme Stuart is created Earl of Lennox by James VI, who at the same time grants to him the extensive estates which had belonged to this illustrious family. [9]
Tuesday, March 5, 1754:
Robert Stobo is given a commission as a Captain in the Virginia Regiment. Pay is to be eight shillings a day as compared to pay for the private soldiers at eight pence a day. He will head up one of the companies of fifty men and will be the regimental engineer, in charge of laying out roads and forts constructed by the Regiment. [10]
March 5, 1762: Jesse Smith (b. March 5, 1762 / d. May 1852).[11] (3rd cousin 8x removed).
[12]
March 5, 1770
Our guide show’s us a circle of paving stones in the pavement below the balcony of the Old State House marking the site of the “horrid massacre”. In the first bloodshed of the Revolution five civilians were slain by British bullets in the “Bloody Massacre”: or “Boston Massacre” in King Street, Boston, March 5, 1770. The troops were removed, and relative calm restored. [13]
Here is the story of that fateful day…
On Monday, March 5, rumor had it there would again be trouble. The town was filled with people, mostly boys and yong men, milling about. Many were from out of town. In fact, the Massacre was only one of many arguments and brawls that broke out on Boston streets that day.
This one began innocently enough, with a dispute ober a barber bill. A wigmaker’s apprentice was pestering an army officetr, tailing him all ovber town, insulting him about the debt, which hade, in truth, been paid.
Eventually, the officer entered a tavern on King Street, opposite the State House. The apprentice continued his harassment outside;. A soldier on guard at the nearby Custom House jmoined the argument and struck the boy with the barrel of his musket. A crowd started to gather. Then somebody rang a nearby church bell, normally used as a fire alarm, and still more people turned out. Many were armed with sticks and clubs.
At the 29th Regiment’s nearby headquarters, Capt. Thomas Preston “walked up and down for near half an hour,” wondering what to do. The lone guard, surrounded by dozens of hostile citizens, was clearly in mortal danger.
At last Preston led a rescue party to the Custom House to bring the sentry back to safety. But once more, Preston and his eight men were themselves trapped and could not return. For fifteen minutes the crowd grew uglier, daring the soldiers to fire, cursing them, pressing closer and closer. Snowballs and rocks flew through the nigbht air. Suddenly a thrown club hit one of the redcoats, knocking him down on the ice. He stood up and fired at point-blank range. More shots quickly rang out.
Preston frantically ordered his men to cease fire. But three people lay dead in the street, tow others were dying, and several more were wounded.
The slain men were a cross section of Boston. One, Crispus Attucks was black; anotheranother, Patrick Carr, was Irish born. Three of the five were young apprentices to local craftmen.
The patriouts played up the incident for all they could. Lt. Gov. Hutchinson, gtheir perennial villain, was forced to remove the troops to Castle Island in the harbor. Samuel Adams “observed his Knees to tremble” as he made the announcemtnt. “I thought I saw hjis face grow pale (and I enjoyed the sight),” wrote Adams.[14]
Paul Revere made a famous engraving of the “Bloody Massacre”, which he copied after Henry Pelham. Rever’s view was factually inaccurate, butr it was great propaganda. Copies of it were sold throughout the town and carried all over the colonies as well as back to England.
But Boston was not yet ready for war. With the troops removed, things queteed considerably. Two ardent patriots, John Adams and Josiah Quincy, defended the Massacre soldiers in couirt and won acquittal for all but two of them. The two guilty men were branded on their thumbs and set free.[15]
March 5, 1771: George Washington Journal: (grandnephew of the wife of the 1st cousin 10x removed) At Winchester all day. Dined with Lord Fairfax.[16]
By March 5, 1776, the Continental Army had artillery troops in position around Boston, including the elevated position at Dorchester Heights, overlooking the city. British General William Howe realized Boston was indefensible to the American positions and decided, on March 7, 1776, to leave the city. Ten days later, on March 17, 1776, the eight-year British occupation of Boston ended when British troops evacuated the city and sailed to the safety of Halifax, Nova Scotia.
The victory at Boston resulted in John Thomas' promotion to major general; soon after, he was assigned to replace General Richard Montgomery, who was killed in action as he and Benedict Arnold attempted to take Quebec. Thomas arrived at Quebec on May 1 and soon lost his own life. Although a physician by profession, he died of smallpox on June 2, as the Patriots retreated up the Richelieu River from their failed siege of the city.[17]
On March 5, 1776, the Duke of Richmond moved in the House of Lords that a humble address be presented to his Majesty, praying that he would be graciously pleased to countermand the march of the foreign troops, and to give directions for an immediate suspension of hostilities in America ("Parliamentary Register," 1st series, vol. v. pp. 174-216.) The protest expressed the sense which the House entertained of the danger and disgrace of the treaties, which acknowledged to all Europe that Great Britain was unable, either from want of men, or disinclination to this service, to furnish a competent number of natural-born subjects to make the first campaign. It was a melancholy consideration that the drawing off the national troops (though feeble for the unhappy purpose on which they were employed) would yet leave Great Britain naked and exposed to the assaults and invasion of powerful neighboring and foreign nations.
The document then pointed out that a reconciliation with the colonies would be preferable to the employment of foreigners, who, when they were at so great a distance from their own country, and suffering under the distresses of a war wherein they had no concern, with so many temptations to exchange vassalage for freedom, would be more likely to mutiny or desert than to unite faithfully and co-operate with his Majesty's natural-born subjects.
After showing the danger of foreign troops being brought into the realm, and complaining that they had already been introduced into two of the strongest fortresses (Hanoverian troops had been sent to Gibraltar and Port Mahon),the protest continues: "We have, moreover, just reason to apprehend that when the colonies come to understand that Great Britain is forming alliances, and hiring foreign troops for their destruction, they may think they are well justified by the example, in endeavoring to avail themselves of the like assistance; and that France, Spain, Prussia, or other powers of Europe may conceive that they have as good a right as Hesse, Brunswick, and Hanau to interfere in our domestic quarrels."
The danger of being obliged to defend the Landgrave of Hesse in his quarrels in Europe was then pointed out, and the opinion was expressed "that Great Britain never before entered into a treaty so expensive, so unequal, so dishonorable, and so dangerous in its consequences."
In introducing the protest, the Duke of Richmond gave a short history of the several treaties entered into, since 1702, with the Landgraves of Hesse, and showed that the successive landgraves, from time to time, rose in their demands; and still, as they continued to extort better terms, never failed to establish their former extortion as a precedent for the basis of the new succeeding treaty, always taking care to make some new demand on Great Britain. This treaty was "a downright, mercenary bargain, for the taking into pay of a certain number of hirelings, who were bought and sold like so many beasts for slaughter. . . . But taking it on the other ground, that the treaties were formed on the basis of an alliance, what would be the consequence? That if any of these powers were attacked, or should wantonly provoke an attack, for the engagement was left general and unconditional, we should give them all the succor in our power. Thus, for the assistance of a few thousand foreign mercenaries, we are not only to pay double, but we are to enter into a solemn engagement to exert our whole force to give them all the succor in our power, if the Landgrave or the Duke shall be attacked or disturbed in the possession of his dominions."
The Duke of Richmond further remarked on the danger of keeping a body of twelve thousand foreigners together under the command of one of their own generals, on the possibility of such a general arriving at the supreme command, and on the confusion which might be created by a difference on this head between the foreign general and the commander- in-chief.
The Earl of Suffolk answered in behalf of the administration. "The tenor of the treaties themselves," he said, " is no other than has been usual on former occasions. The present, it is true, is filled with pompous, high-sounding phrases of alliance, but I will be so ingenuous as to confess to the noble duke that I consider them merely in that light; and if he will, I allow that the true object of those treaties is not so much to create an alliance as to hire a body of troops, which the present rebellion in America has rendered necessary."
Having thus made light of the terms of a treaty for which he was personally responsible, Lord Suffolk proceeded to point out that the conditions of that treaty were advantageous if the employment of the troops should only last one year, but that in any case, if they wanted the soldiers, they were obliged to acquiesce in the terms demanded. He expressed his belief that the commander- in-chief superseded all other generals, and on being pressed he asserted positively that such was the case.
The Earl of Carlisle was persuaded that the number of hands required to carry on manufactures, the little use of new levies, at least for the first campaign, and the desire that every friend of his country ought to have for putting a speedy termination to the unhappy troubles, united, created an evident necessity for the employment of foreigners in preference to native troops. He called on their lordships to consider the unwieldy bulk of the empire, and the operations necessary even in case of a defensive war, and asked if it were possible for such an inconsiderable spot as the island of Great Britain, in the nature of things, to furnish numbers sufficient to carry on operations the nature of such a service would necessarily demand.
The debate was continued at great length and with considerable violence. On the Whig side the Duke of Cumberland lamented "to see Brunswickers who once, to their great honor, were employed in the defence of the liberties of the subject, now sent to subjugate his constitutional liberties in another part of this vast empire." The Duke of Manchester pointed out that "that man must be deemed a mercenary soldier who fights for pay in the cause in which he has no concern." The Earl of Effingham suggested that by a decree of the Imperial Chamber the directors of the circle might be ordered to march into the Landgrave's country to compel him to some act of justice or retribution; in which case England would be obliged to excuse her breach of the treaty by her ministers' ignorance of the imperial constitutions, or else to enter into a war, like that in America, not to maintain, but to subvert, the liberties of the Germanic body. The Earl of Shelburne denied the necessity of employing foreigners, and was supported in this by Lord Camden, who also appealed to their lordships, if the whole transaction were not a compound of the most solemn mockery, fallacy, and gross imposition that was ever attempted to be put upon a House of Parliament. "Is there one of your lordships," he asked, "that does not perceive most clearly that the whole is a mere mercenary bargain for the hire of troops on one side, and for the sale of human blood on the other; and that the devoted wretches thus purchased for slaughter are mere mercenaries in the worst sense of the word ?"
The Tory lords would seem to have done less than their share of the talking, perhaps because it was unnecessary for them to speak, sure as they were of a majority. The motion was lost by thirty-two votes to one hundred.
It seems to me that their lordships were a little hard upon the German soldiers. Most of these poor fellows did not fight for pay at all, but fought because they could not help it. The people who were really "mercenaries in the worst sense of the word" were the Landgrave, the Duke, and the princes; but perhaps the noble lords could hardly be expected to say so.
As to the conduct of the British ministry in hiring the troops, it would seem that if the war were to be carried on energetically, no other course was possible. Owing to the distrust of regular soldiers that still lingered in English minds, the British army had not been maintained during peace of a strength equal to the demands now made upon it. Enlistments were made with difficulty, and could at best bring in but raw recruits. Conscription seems always to be out of the question in England. If men must be had, Lord North must seek them in Germany.
But the ministry and the empire paid a terrible price for the German auxiliaries. The answer to the treaty with the Landgrave was the Declaration of Independence. The employment of foreign mercenaries by the British government was largely instrumental in persuading the Americans to throw off their allegiance to the English crown, and to seek the alliance of their former enemies. The danger pointed out in the protest of the lords became a reality, and men of English blood held that France had as good a right as Hesse to interfere in their domestic quarrels (See Leckey's " History of England in the Eighteenth Century," vol. iii. pp. 453 et seq. See also a clause in the Declaration of Independence (given in Appendix C).[18]
George Rogers CLARK TO JOSEPH LINDSAY, March 5, 1782
[Draper MSS.,11j17.—Transcript from Pogue Papers.]
FORT NELSON March 5th, 1782.
SIR - - The certain inteligence from Detroit of their intention of Taking this place early in the Spring makes it necessary that we alter our former resolutions[19] you will please to make immediate preparations for furnishing three hundred Rations of Beef pr day at this post The militia of Lincoln is to March to this the 15th Inst you may take the advantage of their route in getting your first Supply I expect you’ll make every necessary arrangement in your Department you are to receive all Major Moore’s purchase of Cattle and be accountable for them You will be too busy yourself of Course, Depute some person — encourage the people in your Quarter to act Spiritedly — if we repell this invasion they may not expect another - - we are going to Build armed Boats to Station at the Mouth of Miami to dispute the navigation of the Ohio either up or down. Take all the pains you Can to find out and encourage Boat-builders and good workmen to repair to this place immediately, they shall have good wages in hard Money; if you can find experienced Ship Carpenters that come immediately he shall have almost what wages he will ask
I am Sir your Mt Obedt Servt
G.R. CLARK[20]
March 5, 1782: The English Parliament votes to negotiate peace with the United States.[21]
Michael Huffuagle writing from Hannastown, March 8, 1782, says: “The savages last Sunday three weeks took into captivity two families upon Raccoon and Short creeks below Pittsburgh. I am afraid the first good weather we may expect a stroke upon some of our frontiers here.”[22]
March 5, 1783
March 5, 1783: King Stanislaus Augustus Poniatowski granted rights to Jews of Kovno.[23]
March 5, 1799: This is what I have on Francis Godlove (b. January 16, 1797) who married Elizabeth Didawick (b. March 5, 1799 d. September 19, 1867). They had 13 children.
Family Group Sheet
==========================================================================================
Husband: Francis GODLOVE
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Birth: January 15, 1797
Marriage: October 14, 1820
Father: ??? GODLOVE (1716- )
Mother: UNKNOWN ( - )
==========================================================================================
Wife: Elizabeth DIDAWICK
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Birth: March 5, 1799
Death: September 19, 1867
Father:
Mother: [24]
1812 - March 5 - Robert Harrison[25] of Harrison County, Ky., one of the heirs at law of Benjamin Harrison, deceased, appointed his brother and co-heir, Battle Harrison of Belmont County, Ohio, his attorney-in-fact to obtain warrants due to their deceased father for his services as a Captain in the 13th Virginia Regiment. [26]
1812 - March 5 - Before John Miller and L. Robinson, Justices of the Peace for Harrison County, Ky., Hugh Newell, Robert Newell and Thomas Moore deposed that they were well acquainted with Benjamin Harrison, deceased, from time of his marriage, until his death; that Battle Harrison of Belmont County, Ohio, and Robert Harrison of Harrison County, Ky. were acknowledged by Benjamin Harrison as his legitimate children. Thomas Moore further declared that Benjamin Harrison and himself were both Captains in the 13th Regiment. [27]
March 5, 1821: James Monroe inaugurated a president for second term.[28]
March 5, 1830: Mary Elizabeth Smith12 [Gabriel D. Smith11 , Gabriel Smith10, John “LR” Smith9, Ambrose J. Smith8, Christopher Smith7, Christopher Smith6, Thomas Smythe5, Thomas Smythe4, John Smythe3, Richard2, William1] (b. July 3, 1829 in Franklin co MS / d. October 20, 1910 in Carroll Co. GA) married Walter Tillman Warren (b. March 5, 1830 in Henry Co. GA / d. May 14, 1915 in Carroll Co. GA) on August 14, 1853 in Carroll Co. GA. [29]
March 5, 1839: Detachments arrive With Cherokee refugees at Ft. Gibson, led by named men, on the following dates: March 5, 1839 – James Brown
March 5, 1845: Maiden A. Cavender (b. March 5, 1845 in GA / d. September 23, 1923 in GA).[30]
March 5, 1849: Zachary Taylor
Inaugural Address
Monday, March 5, 1849
For the second time in the history of the Republic, March 4 fell on a Sunday. The inaugural ceremony was postponed until the following Monday, raising the question as to whether the Nation was without a President for a day. General Taylor, popularly known as "Old Rough and Ready," was famous for his exploits in the Mexican War. He never had voted in a national election until his own contest for the Presidency. Outgoing President Polk accompanied the general to the ceremony at the Capitol. The oath of office was administered by Chief Justice Roger Taney on the East Portico. After the ceremony, the new President attended several inaugural celebrations, including a ball that evening in a specially built pavilion on Judiciary Square.
ELECTED by the American people to the highest office known to our laws, I appear here to take the oath prescribed by the Constitution, and, in compliance with a time-honored custom, to address those who are now assembled.
The confidence and respect shown by my countrymen in calling me to be the Chief Magistrate of a Republic holding a high rank among the nations of the earth have inspired me with feelings of the most profound gratitude; but when I reflect that the acceptance of the office which their partiality has bestowed imposes the discharge of the most arduous duties and involves the weightiest obligations, I am conscious that the position which I have been called to fill, though sufficient to satisfy the loftiest ambition, is surrounded by fearful responsibilities. Happily, however, in the performance of my new
duties I shall not be without able cooperation. The legislative and judicial branches of the Government present prominent examples of distinguished civil attainments and matured experience, and it shall be my endeavor to call to my assistance in the Executive Departments individuals whose talents, integrity, and purity of character will furnish ample guaranties for the faithful and honorable performance of the trusts to be committed to their charge. With such aids and an honest purpose to do whatever is right, I hope to execute diligently, impartially, and for the best interests of the country the manifold duties
devolved upon me.
In the discharge of these duties my guide will be the Constitution, which I this day swear to "preserve, protect, and defend." For the interpretation of that instrument I shall look to the decisions of the judicial tribunals established by its authority and to the practice of the Government under the earlier Presidents, who had so large a share in its formation. To the example of those illustrious patriots I shall always defer with reverence, and especially to his example who was by so many titles "the Father of his Country."
To command the Army and Navy of the United States; with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties and to appoint ambassadors and other officers; to give to Congress information of the state of the Union and recommend such measures as he shall judge to be necessary; and to take care that the laws shall be faithfully executed-these are the most important functions intrusted to the resident by the Constitution, and it may be expected that I shall briefly indicate the principles which will control me in their execution.
Chosen by the body of the people under the assurance that my Administration would be devoted to the welfare of the whole country, and not to the support of any particular section or merely local interest, I this day renew the declarations I have heretofore made and proclaim my fixed determination to maintain to the extent of my ability the Government in its original purity and to adopt as the basis of my public policy those great republican doctrines which constitute the strength of our national existence.
In reference to the Army and Navy, lately employed with so much distinction on active service, care shall be taken to insure the highest condition of efficiency, and in furtherance of that object the military and naval schools, sustained by the liberality of Congress, shall receive the special attention of the Executive.
As American freemen we can not but sympathize in all efforts to extend the blessings of civil and political liberty, but at the same time we are warned by the admonitions of history and the voice of our own beloved Washington to abstain from entangling alliances with foreign nations. In all disputes between conflicting governments it is our interest not less than our duty to remain strictly neutral, while our geographical position, the genius of our institutions and our people, the advancing spirit of civilization, and, above all, the dictates of religion direct us to the cultivation of peaceful and friendly relations with all other powers. It is to be hoped that no international question can now arise which a government confident in its own strength and resolved to protect its own just rights may not settle by wise negotiation; and it eminently becomes a government like our own, founded on the morality and intelligence of its citizens and upheld by their affections, to exhaust every resort of honorable diplomacy before appealing to arms. In the conduct of our foreign relations I shall conform to these views, as I believe them essential to the best interests and the true honor of the country.
The appointing power vested in the President imposes delicate and onerous duties. So far as it is possible to be informed, I shall make honesty, capacity, and fidelity indispensable prerequisites to the bestowal of office, and the absence of either of these qualities shall be deemed sufficient cause for removal.
It shall be my study to recommend such constitutional measures to Congress as may be necessary and proper to secure encouragement and protection to the great interests of agriculture, commerce, and manufactures, to improve our rivers and harbors, to provide for the speedy extinguishment of the public debt, to enforce a strict accountability on the part of all officers of the Government and the utmost economy in all public expenditures; but it is for the wisdom of Congress itself, in which all legislative powers are vested by the Constitution, to regulate these and other matters of domestic policy. I shall look with confidence to the enlightened patriotism of that body to adopt such measures of conciliation as may harmonize conflicting interests and tend to perpetuate that Union which should be the paramount object of our hopes and affections. In any action calculated to promote an object so near the heart of everyone who truly loves his country I will zealously unite with the coordinate branches of the Government.
In conclusion I congratulate you, my fellow-citizens, upon the high state of prosperity to which the goodness of Divine Providence has conducted our common country. Let us invoke a continuance of the same protecting care which has led us from small beginnings to the eminence we this day occupy, and let us seek to deserve that continuance by prudence and moderation in our councils, by well-directed attempts to assuage the bitterness which too often marks unavoidable differences of opinion, by the promulgation and practice of just and liberal principles, and by an enlarged patriotism, which shall acknowledge no limits but those of our own widespread Republic. [31]
March 5, 1855: Child of Franz Ferdinand and…
Name
Birth
Death
Notes
By Duchess Elisabeth in Bavaria (December 24, 1837 – September 10, 1898; married on April 24, 1854 in St. Augustine's Church, Vienna)
Sophie Friederike Dorothea Maria Josepha
March 5 1855
May 29 1857
died in childhood
[32] (Step 13th great granddaughter of the 5th cousin 17x removed)
Children
Birth
Death
Notes
Sofie Friederike Dorothea Maria Josefa
March 5, 1855
May 29, 1857
Died in childhood
March 5, 1860
“Let us not be slandered our duties, or intimidated from preserving our dignity and our rights by any menace
But let us have faith that Right, eternal Right makes might,
And as we understand our duty, so do it![33]
March 5, 1863:
Maj. Patrick Bowes-Lyon
March 5, 1863
October 5, 1946
Alice Wiltshire (d 1953)
Lt. Gavin Bowes-Lyon (1895–1917)
Angus Bowes-Lyon (1899–1923)
Jean Bowes-Lyon (1904–1963)
Margaret Bowes-Lyon (1907–1999)
[34] (8th cousin 3x removed)
March 5 and 6, 1863: Battle of Thompson’s Station, TN.[35]
Sat. March 5, 1864:
Went to Brasier[36] 80 miles on cars – some
Good farms – country flat alligator swamps at canebreak some heavy timber
Cross burwick bay[37] in the right
Layed on ground
William Harrison Goodlove (2nd great grandfather) Civil War Diary 24th Iowa Infantry[38]
March 5, 1881: Earnest E. Heald b March 5, 1881 d before May 19, 1898. [39]
March 5, 1903
(Pleasant Valley) Ira Miller and Willis Goodlove (great granduncle) were a tie for sub-director. Don’t lock horns too tight, boys, there’s no money in it. (Winton Goodlove’s note: Ira Miller lived at the junction of what is now Indian Bridge Road and Highway 13 on the northeast corner. Ramsey’s lived there when I was little and their children went to school at Pleasant Valley also. He was a relative of the Ramseys. Melvin Boyce’s lived there later and their son Robert went to Pleasant Valley. Gilbert worked by the month for Melvin at one time. Ira Miller was the father of Irene Miller, who married Eli Thompson. Their children Louise and June also attended Pleasant Valley School. Harlan Starry’s lived there later and Robert Zingula was the last family to live in the building. Highway 13 took the building site when the four lane highway went through.)[40]
March 5, 1933:
February 15, 1933: President-elect Franklin Delano Roosevelt (2nd cousin 5x removed of the wife of the grand uncle of the husband of the sister in law of the 1st great grandnephew of the wife of the 1st cousin 10x removed) is unhurt when Chicago mayor Anton Cermak is killed by a bullet fired by Giuseppe Zangara, while both are riding in a motorcade in Miami, Florida.[41] On this day in 1933, a deranged, unemployed brick layer named Giuseppe Zangara shouts Too many people are starving! and fires a gun at America's president-elect, Franklin D. Roosevelt.
Roosevelt had just delivered a speech in Miami's Bayfront Park from the back seat of his open touring car when Zangara opened fire with six rounds. Five people were hit. The president escaped injury but the mayor of Chicago, Anton Cermak, who was also in attendance, received a mortal stomach wound in the attack.
Several men tackled the assailant and might have beaten him to death if Roosevelt had not intervened, telling the crowd to leave justice to the authorities. Zangara later claimed I don't hate Mr. Roosevelt personallyI hate all officials and anyone who is rich. He also told the FBI that chronic stomach pain led to his action: Since my stomach hurt I want to make even with the capitalists by kill the president. My stomach hurt long time [sic].
Zangara's extreme action reflected the anger and frustration felt among many working Americans during the Great Depression. At the time of the shooting, Roosevelt was still only the president-elect and had yet to be sworn in. His policies remained untested, but reports of Roosevelt's composure during the assassination attempt filled the following day's newspapers and did much to enforce Roosevelt's public image as a strong leader.
Unsubstantiated reports later claimed that Zangara's real target had been Cermak and hinted at Zangara's connection to organized crime in Chicago. Zangara was initially tried for attempted murder and sentenced to 80 years in prison, but when Mayor Cermak later died of his wounds, Zangara was retried and sentenced to death. Zangara died on the electric chair on March 5, 1933.[42]
March 5, 1942: Elma Gottlieb, born October 13, 1903 in Duisburg, resided Koln. Deportation: from Koln, October 1941, to Litzmannstadt. Date of Death: March 5, 1942.[43]
March 5: 1942: In the wake of the February 24 Struma sinking, the British War Cabinet reaffirms its decision not to allow “illegal” Jewish refugees admission to Palestine. [44]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[1] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[2] Wikipedia
[3] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[4] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[5] Wikipedia
[6] Wikipedia
[7] Wikipedia
[8] http://www.historyorb.com/events/date/1558
[9] http://archive.org/stream/lettersofmarystu00mary/lettersofmarystu00mary_djvu.txt
[10] http://www.nps.gov/archive/fone/1754.htm
[11]Proposed Descendants of William Smythe
[12] Photo by Jeff Goodlove
[13] The Complete Guide to Boston’s Freedom Trail by Charles Bahne page 4-5, 25.
[14] The Complete Guide to Boston’s Freedom Trail by Charles Bahne page 26.
[15] The Complete Guide to Boston’s Freedom Trail by Charles Bahne page 26-27.
[16] Although scheduled for 4 Mar., the officers’ meeting was actually held today. Besides GW and Dr. James Craik, only four officers or their representatives were present. After hearing GW’s report and learning that William Crawford had begun to survey along the Great Kanawha River, they unanimously ag reed that he should be instructed to finish his work there and then proceed as soon as possible to survey lands on the Tygart Valley River, a branch of the Monongahela. To cover Crawford’s expenses, GW was authorized to advance him £80, collecting money for that purpose not only from officers but now for the first time from former rank-and-file members of the regiment also. Each field officer was assessed LII 5s., each captain £6 15s., each subaltern £4 lOs., and each common soldier a fourth of a subaltern’s share (minutes of the officers of the Virginia Regiment, 5 Mar. 1771, DLC:GW).
[17] http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/the-siege-of-boston
[18] http://www.americanrevolution.org/hessians/hess3.html
[19] The plan of the British had been to attack Fort Pitt but this was given up on account of the report that it was in a good state of defense but that the Falls could easily be reduced. After Colonel Crawford’s defeat, Wheeling became the objective for McKee and Caldwell with their rangers and Indians. Reports of Clark’s expedition caused them to return to Sandusky. The march into Kentucky and the Battle of the Blue Licks followed. See introduction, ante~ xxxix-li. Washington-Irvine Correspondence, Butterfield, 1882.
[20] GEORGE ROGERS CLARK PAPERS 1781-1784, Edited by James Alton James, pg. 43
[21] On This Day in America by John Wagman.
[22] Washington-Irvine Correspondence by Butterfield, 1882.
[23] http://thisdayinjewishhistory.blogspot.com/
[24] http://familytreemaker.genealogy.com/users/d/i/d/Jan-C-Didawick-Berkeley-Springs/PDFGENE3.pdf
[25] ROBERT2 HARRISON, born in Fayette County, Pennsylvania, presumably about 1769, since he was a landholder 1790/1793; died in Harrison County, Kentucky, 1821. An affidavit signed by his uncles, Hugh and Robert Newall, as well as by Captain Thomas Moore, they deposed that this Robert Harrison was a son of Captain Benjamin Harrison. (Va. Soldiers of 1776, Vol. 3, Page 1397, by Louis A Burgess.) In 1812, Robert and his brother, Battle Harrison, made application for Bounty Land due their father, Captain Benjamin Harrison, and were awarded four thousand acres. In a law-suit, No. 5802, in Harrison County, Kentucky, filed 1831: Miller vs. Harrison Heirs: "Robert Harrison died 1821, leaving wife Isabell (née Hodges, married 1806) Harrison, and four daughters, namely, Mirah,6 Rebecca,6 Elizabeth6 and Isabell6 Harrison and, one son, Joseph6 Harrison, deceased, so his lands descended to their mother and four sisters. Isabell Harrison, the mother, later married William McCall."
Publication of the State Historical Society of Wisconsin Frontier Advance on Upper Ohio, 1778-1779. Draper Series Vol. 23, page 386.
Genealogies of Virginia Families, From the Virginia Magazine of History and Bioagraphy, Volume III, 1981
(The compilers first cousin, 6 times removed.)
[26] (Burgess, v. 3, P. 1397) Chronology of Benjamin Harrison compiled by Isobel Stebbins Giuvezan. Afton, Missouri, 1973 http://www.shawhan.com/benharrison.html
[27] (Burgess, v. 3, p. 1397) Chronology of Benjamin Harrison compiled by Isobel Stebbins Giuvezan. Afton, Missouri, 1973 http://www.shawhan.com/benharrison.html
[28] The Papers of Andrew Jackson, Volume V, 1821-1824
[29] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe
[30] Proposed Descendants of William Smythe.
[31] http://www.geni.com/people/Zachary-S-Taylor-12th-President-of-the-USA/6000000002143404336
[32] Wikipedia
[33] Lincoln Cantata, by Gyula Fekete, For the St. Charles Singers.
[34] Wikipedia
[35] State Capital Memorial, Austin, TX, February 11, 2012
[36] Left Algiers by railroad to Brashear City, eighty miles. Marched from there to Alexandria, 200 miles, from Alexandria to Natchitoches, Louisiana, eighty miles, from Natchitoches to Sabine Cross-Roads, fifty-two miles.
(Supplement to the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies. Part II Record of Events Volume 20 Serial no. 32. Broadfoot Publishing Company Wilmington, NC 1995.)
[37] After the regiment made one trip to Algiers and back [26 Feb 1864], it was sent to Berwick Bay to join Major General Banks for his second attempt to clear the Red River, attack Shreveport, and enter Texas[5 Mar 1864]. The regiment sent all unnecessary baggage to New Orleans so they could make a rapid advance. (Pvt. Miller, 24th Volunteer, http://home.comcast.net/~troygoss/millbk3.html.)
On March 5th, the regiment was conveyed by rail to Berwick Bay, La. From there all camp equipage that could possibly be dispensed with and all extra baggage was sent back to New Orleans, and the troops prepared for rapid marching as reinforcements to the arm under General Banks, then engaged in his unfortunate Red River Expedition. The troops consisted of the Third Division of the Thirteenth Army corps, which included the brigade which the Twenty-forth Iowa belonged. (Roster of Iowa Soldiers in the War of the Rebellion Together with Historical Sketches of Volunteer Organizations 1861-1866 Vol. III, 24th Regiment – Infantry, Published by authority of the general Assembly, under the direction of Brig. Gen. Guy E. Logan, Adjutant General.)
ftp://ftp.rootsweb.com/pub/usgenweb/ia/state/military/civilwar/book/cwbk 24.txt
[38] Annotated by Jeffery Lee Goodlove
[39] http://cwcfamily.org/egy3.htm
[40] Winton Goodlove papers.
[41] On This Day in America by John Wagman.
[42] http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/fdr-escapes-assassination-in-miami
[43] [1] Gedenkbuch, Opfer der Verfolgung der Juden unter der nationalsozialistischen Gewaltherrschaft in Deutschland 1933-1945. 2., wesentlich erweiterte Auflage, Band II G-K, Bearbeitet und herausgegben vom Bundesarchiv, Koblenz, 2006, pg. 1033-1035,.
[44] http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/Chronology_1942.html
No comments:
Post a Comment